Psychiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro 88100, Italy.
Psychiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro 88100, Italy; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.
Span J Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 Jul-Sep;17(3):154-159. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpmh.2023.07.001. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
Cognitive models suggest the co-occurrence of cognitive biases and aberrant salience is unique to psychosis, but their interaction is not yet fully understood. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the relationship between subjective cognitive biases and aberrant salience in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) in this study.
A sample of 92 subjects with SSDs underwent an assessment using Davos Assessment Cognitive Biases (DACOBS) and the Aberrant Salience Inventory (ASI) in a cross-sectional design. We evaluated psychopathological differences based on ASI scores and conducted a linear regression analysis to examine the variables associated with aberrant salience.
Subjects with an ASI score ≥14 demonstrated significantly higher scores across all subscales and total score of ASI and DACOBS (p<0.001). ASI subscales were significantly positive correlated with all DACOBS subscales, ranging from 0.250 for Increased Significance and Safety Behavior to 0.679 for Heightened Emotionality and Social cognition problems. The linear regression analysis revealed a positive association between aberrant salience and the DACOBS subscales jumping to conclusions (JTC) (β=0.220), social cognition problems (β=0.442), subjective cognitive problems (β=0.405), and a negative association with the subscale belief inflexibility (β=-0.350).
Our findings suggest that JTC, social cognition problems and subjective cognitive problems may play a central role in the experience of aberrant salience in individuals with SSDs. This work informs about the need of developing prevention and intervention strategies that specifically target cognitive biases and aberrant salience in the treatment of psychosis.
认知模型表明,认知偏差和异常突显的共同发生是精神病独有的,但它们之间的相互作用尚不完全清楚。因此,我们旨在阐明本研究中精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSDs)个体中主观认知偏差与异常突显之间的关系。
本横断面研究纳入了 92 名 SSD 患者,使用Davos 认知偏差评估量表(DACOBS)和异常突显量表(ASI)进行评估。我们根据 ASI 评分评估了精神病理学差异,并进行了线性回归分析,以检验与异常突显相关的变量。
ASI 评分≥14 的患者在 ASI 和 DACOBS 的所有子量表和总分上的得分显著更高(p<0.001)。ASI 子量表与 DACOBS 的所有子量表均呈显著正相关,范围从增加意义和安全行为的 0.250 到增强情绪和社会认知问题的 0.679。线性回归分析显示,异常突显与仓促判断(JTC)(β=0.220)、社会认知问题(β=0.442)、主观认知问题(β=0.405)呈正相关,与信念灵活性不足(β=-0.350)呈负相关。
我们的研究结果表明,JTC、社会认知问题和主观认知问题可能在 SSD 个体异常突显体验中发挥核心作用。这一研究结果强调了在精神病治疗中,需要开发针对认知偏差和异常突显的预防和干预策略。