Katz-Wise Sabra L, Ranker Lynsie R, Korkodilos R, Conti Jennifer, Nelson Kimberly M, Xuan Ziming, Gordon Allegra R
Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital.
Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health.
Psychol Methods. 2024 Apr 4. doi: 10.1037/met0000652.
Some researchers and clinicians may feel hesitant to assess sexual orientation and gender-related characteristics in youth surveys because they are unsure if youth will respond to these questions or are concerned the questions will cause discomfort or offense. This can result in missed opportunities to identify LGBTQ+ youth and address health inequities among this population. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and sociodemographic patterns of missingness among survey questions assessing current sexual orientation, gender identity and expression (SOGIE), and past change in sexual orientation (sexual fluidity) among a diverse sample of U.S. youth. Participants ( = 4,245, ages 14-25 years; 95% cisgender, 70% straight/heterosexual, 53% youth of color), recruited from an online survey panel, completed the Wave 1 survey of the longitudinal Sexual Orientation Fluidity in Youth (SO*FLY) Study in 2021. Current SOGIE, past sexual fluidity, and sociodemographic characteristics were assessed for missingness. Overall, 95.7% of participants had no missing questions, 3.8% were missing one question, and 0.5% were missing ≥ 2 questions. Past sexual fluidity and assigned sex were most commonly missing. Sociodemographic differences between participants who skipped the SOGIE questions and the rest of the sample were minimal. Missingness for the examined items was low and similar across sociodemographic characteristics, suggesting that almost all youth are willing to respond to survey questions about SOGIE. SOGIE and sexual fluidity items should be included in surveys and clinical assessments of youth to inform clinical care, policy-making, interventions, and resource development to improve the health of all youth. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
一些研究人员和临床医生可能会在青少年调查中对评估性取向和性别相关特征感到犹豫,因为他们不确定青少年是否会回答这些问题,或者担心这些问题会引起不适或冒犯。这可能导致错过识别 LGBTQ+ 青少年并解决该人群健康不平等问题的机会。本研究的目的是调查在美国青少年的多样化样本中,评估当前性取向、性别认同和表达(SOGIE)以及过去性取向变化(性流动)的调查问题中缺失情况的患病率和社会人口学模式。参与者(n = 4245,年龄在 14 - 25 岁之间;95% 为顺性别者,70% 为异性恋,53% 为有色人种青少年)从一个在线调查小组招募,于 2021 年完成了青少年性取向流动性纵向研究(SO*FLY)的第 1 波调查。对当前的 SOGIE、过去的性流动情况和社会人口学特征进行了缺失情况评估。总体而言,95.7% 的参与者没有缺失问题,3.8% 的参与者缺失一个问题,0.5% 的参与者缺失≥2 个问题。过去的性流动情况和指定性别最常缺失。跳过 SOGIE 问题的参与者与样本中的其他参与者之间的社会人口学差异很小。所检查项目的缺失率较低,且在社会人口学特征方面相似,这表明几乎所有青少年都愿意回答关于 SOGIE 的调查问题。SOGIE 和性流动项目应纳入青少年的调查和临床评估中,以为临床护理、政策制定、干预措施和资源开发提供信息,以改善所有青少年的健康状况。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2025 APA, 保留所有权利)