School of Social Work, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Department of Social Welfare, Luskin School of Public Affairs, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Jun 9;25(7):1378-1385. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad048.
Sexual and gender minority (SGM) nicotine and tobacco use disparities are well-documented among youth and young adults (YYA), and despite decades of prevention efforts, these disparities stubbornly persist. To better understand tobacco use disparities and craft tailored interventions, tobacco use patterns must be assessed in a contemporary sample of YYA across lines of sexual and gender identity, sex assigned at birth, and tobacco product types.
Data were from an online survey of a diverse sample of emerging adult tobacco users (ages 18-29; N = 1491) in California, United States (2020-2021). Participants were recruited from various online and in-person locations. Bivariate and adjusted models assessed differences in four nicotine and tobacco use outcomes (past 30-day use of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, other tobacco products, and multiple tobacco product types) across six groups: Cisgender heterosexual males, cisgender heterosexual females, cisgender sexual minority (SM) males, cisgender SM females, transfeminine participants, and transmasculine participants.
Compared to cisgender heterosexual males, both transfeminine (OR = 2.25, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 1.29 to 4.05) and transmasculine (OR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.32 to 2.80) participants had higher odds of using cigarettes. Few differences were noted between groups in use of e-cigarettes. Cisgender heterosexual males had higher odds of other tobacco product use, compared to most other groups (eg, cisgender SM males: OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.87). Transmasculine participants had higher odds of multiple product use, compared to cisgender heterosexual females. Among multiple product users, transfeminine participants had the highest prevalence of using all three individual product types (35.6%).
Results highlight the need for different tobacco control approaches across sexual and gender identities, sex assigned at birth, and nicotine and tobacco products.
SGM nicotine and tobacco use disparities remain entrenched, despite concerted efforts to reduce them. The SGM population is heterogeneous and different SGM subgroups may have different needs. This study assessed, among young adult nicotine and tobacco users in California, U.S. patterns of tobacco use across sexual and gender identities, sex assigned at birth, as well as specific tobacco products used-a necessity to craft tailored tobacco control measures. We found patterns of nicotine and tobacco product use across several of these characteristics, highlighting how different prevention and cessation interventions may be needed to meaningfully address SGM nicotine and tobacco use disparities.
性少数群体(SGM)和跨性别者在青少年和年轻人(YYA)中的尼古丁和烟草使用差异是有据可查的,尽管数十年来一直在进行预防工作,但这些差异仍然顽固存在。为了更好地了解烟草使用差异并制定有针对性的干预措施,必须评估性取向和性别认同、出生时性别指定以及烟草产品类型方面的当代 YYA 烟草使用模式。
数据来自美国加利福尼亚州一项针对新兴成年烟草使用者(年龄 18-29 岁;N=1491)的在线调查(2020-2021 年)。参与者是从各种在线和现场地点招募的。采用双变量和调整模型,评估了六个群体(顺性别异性恋男性、顺性别异性恋女性、顺性别性少数群体(SM)男性、顺性别 SM 女性、跨性别女性和跨性别男性)在四个尼古丁和烟草使用结果(过去 30 天使用香烟、电子烟、其他烟草产品和多种烟草产品类型)方面的差异。
与顺性别异性恋男性相比,跨性别女性(OR=2.25,95%置信区间(CI)=1.29 至 4.05)和跨性别男性(OR=1.85,95%CI=1.32 至 2.80)使用香烟的可能性更高。在电子烟使用方面,各组之间几乎没有差异。与大多数其他群体相比,顺性别异性恋男性使用其他烟草产品的可能性更高(例如,顺性别 SM 男性:OR=0.57,95%CI=0.37 至 0.87)。跨性别男性使用多种产品的可能性更高,与顺性别异性恋女性相比。在多种产品使用者中,跨性别男性的使用所有三种单独产品类型(35.6%)的可能性最高。
结果强调需要根据性取向和性别认同、出生时性别指定以及尼古丁和烟草产品的不同采取不同的烟草控制方法。
尽管努力减少,但性少数群体的尼古丁和烟草使用差异仍然存在。性少数群体是异质的,不同的性少数群体亚群可能有不同的需求。本研究评估了美国加利福尼亚州年轻成年尼古丁和烟草使用者中,根据性取向和性别认同、出生时性别指定以及使用的特定烟草产品,评估了烟草使用模式——这是制定有针对性的烟草控制措施的必要条件。我们发现,在这些特征中的几个方面都存在尼古丁和烟草产品使用模式,这突出表明,为了切实解决性少数群体的尼古丁和烟草使用差异,可能需要不同的预防和戒烟干预措施。