Islam Mir Raihanul, Angell Blake, Naher Nahitun, Islam Bushra Zarin, Khan Mushtaq Husain, McKee Martin, Hutchinson Eleanor, Balabanova Dina, Ahmed Syed Masud
Poverty, Gender and Inclusion Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Apr 4;4(4):e0003040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003040. eCollection 2024.
Absenteeism by doctors in public healthcare facilities in rural Bangladesh is a form of chronic rule-breaking and is recognised as a critical problem by the government. We explored the factors underlying this phenomenon from doctors' perspectives. We conducted a facility-based cross-sectional survey in four government hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Junior doctors with experience in rural postings were interviewed to collect data on socio-demographic characteristics, work and living experience at the rural facilities, and associations with professional and social networks. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine the factors associated with rural retention. Of 308 respondents, 74% reported having served each term of their rural postings without interruptions. The main reasons for absenteeism reported by those who interrupted rural postings were formal training opportunities (65%), family commitments (41%), and a miscellaneous group of others (17%). Almost half of the respondents reported unmanageable workloads. Most (96%) faced challenges in their last rural posting, such as physically unsafe environments (70%), verbally abusive behaviour by patients/caregivers (67%) and absenteeism by colleagues that impacted them (48%). Respondents who did not serve their entire rural posting were less likely to report an unmanageable workload than respondents who did (AOR 0.39, 95% CI 0.22-0.70). Respondents with connections to influential people in the local community had a 2.4 times higher chance of serving in rural facilities without interruption than others (AOR 2.40, 95% CI 1.26-4.57). Our findings demonstrate that absenteeism is not universal and depends upon doctors' socio-political networks. Policy interventions rarely target unsupportive or threatening behaviour by caregivers and community members, a pivotal disincentive to doctors' willingness to work in underserved rural areas. Policy responses must promote opportunities for doctors with weak networks who are willing to attend work with appropriate support.
孟加拉国农村地区公共医疗设施中医生旷工是一种长期违规行为,政府已将其视为一个关键问题。我们从医生的角度探讨了这一现象背后的因素。我们在孟加拉国达卡的四家政府医院开展了一项基于机构的横断面调查。对有农村工作经历的初级医生进行访谈,以收集社会人口特征、在农村医疗机构的工作和生活经历以及与专业和社交网络关联的数据。采用多元逻辑回归确定与农村留任相关的因素。在308名受访者中,74%报告称在农村工作的每个任期都未中断过。中断农村工作的人报告的旷工主要原因是正规培训机会(65%)、家庭责任(41%)和其他各类杂项原因(17%)。近一半的受访者报告工作量难以承受。大多数(96%)人在最后一次农村工作中面临挑战,如身体不安全的环境(70%)、患者/护理人员的辱骂行为(67%)以及同事旷工对他们产生影响(48%)。未完成整个农村工作任期的受访者比完成的受访者报告工作量难以承受的可能性更低(比值比0.39,95%置信区间0.22 - 0.70)。与当地社区有影响力的人有联系的受访者在农村医疗机构不间断工作的机会比其他人高2.4倍(比值比2.40,95%置信区间1.26 - 4.57)。我们的研究结果表明,旷工并非普遍现象,而是取决于医生的社会政治网络。政策干预很少针对护理人员和社区成员不支持或有威胁性的行为,而这种行为是阻碍医生在服务欠缺的农村地区工作意愿的关键因素。政策应对措施必须为那些网络薄弱但愿意在适当支持下上班的医生提供机会。