• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善严重多重弱势群体获得全科医疗服务的机会:一项定性研究。

Improving access to general practice for and with people with severe and multiple disadvantage: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Potter Lucy C, Stone Tracey, Swede Julie, Connell Florrie, Cramer Helen, McGeown Helen, Carvalho Maria, Horwood Jeremy, Feder Gene, Farr Michelle, Gaps Bridging

机构信息

Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol.

Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol; National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Apr 25;74(742):e330-e338. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0244. Print 2024 May.

DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2023.0244
PMID:38575183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11005924/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

People with severe and multiple disadvantage (SMD) who experience combinations of homelessness, substance misuse, violence, abuse, and poor mental health have high health needs and poor access to primary care.

AIM

To improve access to general practice for people with SMD by facilitating collaborative service improvement meetings between healthcare staff, people with lived experience of SMD, and those who support them; participants were then interviewed about this work.

DESIGN AND SETTING

The Bridging Gaps group is a collaboration between healthcare staff, researchers, women with lived experience of SMD, and a charity that supports them in a UK city. A project was co-produced by the Bridging Gaps group to improve access to general practice for people with SMD, which was further developed with three inner-city general practices.

METHOD

Nine service improvement meetings were facilitated at three general practices, and six of these were formally observed. Nine practice staff and four women with lived experience of SMD were interviewed. Three women with lived experience of SMD and one staff member who supports them participated in a focus group. Data were analysed inductively and deductively using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

By providing time and funding opportunities to motivated general practice staff and involving participants with lived experience of SMD, service changes were made in an effort to improve access for people with SMD. These included prioritising patients on an inclusion patient list with more flexible access, providing continuity for patients via a care coordinator and micro-team of clinicians, and developing an information-sharing document. The process and outcomes improved connections within and between general practices, support organisations, and people with SMD.

CONCLUSION

The co-designed strategies described in this study could be adapted locally and evaluated in other areas. Investing in this focused way of working may improve accessibility to health care, health equity, and staff wellbeing.

摘要

背景

患有严重多重不利因素(SMD)的人群,即同时经历无家可归、药物滥用、暴力、虐待和心理健康问题的人,有很高的健康需求,但获得初级医疗服务的机会却很差。

目的

通过促进医护人员、有SMD生活经历的人和支持他们的人之间的协作服务改进会议,改善SMD患者获得全科医疗服务的机会;然后对参与者进行关于这项工作的访谈。

设计与背景

“弥合差距”小组是医护人员、研究人员、有SMD生活经历的女性以及在英国一个城市支持她们的慈善机构之间的合作。“弥合差距”小组共同开展了一个项目,以改善SMD患者获得全科医疗服务的机会,并与三个市中心的全科诊所进一步合作。

方法

在三个全科诊所组织了九次服务改进会议,其中六次进行了正式观察。对九名诊所工作人员和四名有SMD生活经历的女性进行了访谈。三名有SMD生活经历的女性和一名支持她们的工作人员参加了焦点小组。使用主题分析法对数据进行归纳和演绎分析。

结果

通过为积极主动的全科诊所工作人员提供时间和资金机会,并让有SMD生活经历的参与者参与进来,做出了服务改变,以努力改善SMD患者的就医机会。这些改变包括在包容性患者名单上对患者进行优先排序,提供更灵活的就医途径,通过护理协调员和临床医生微型团队为患者提供连续性服务,以及制定一份信息共享文件。这个过程和结果改善了全科诊所、支持组织和SMD患者内部以及彼此之间的联系。

结论

本研究中描述的共同设计策略可以在当地进行调整,并在其他地区进行评估。以这种有针对性的工作方式进行投资可能会改善医疗服务的可及性、健康公平性和工作人员的幸福感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca02/11060826/7773a9da24c3/bjgpmay-2024-74-742-e330-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca02/11060826/59ca976d8f4a/bjgpmay-2024-74-742-e330-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca02/11060826/7773a9da24c3/bjgpmay-2024-74-742-e330-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca02/11060826/59ca976d8f4a/bjgpmay-2024-74-742-e330-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca02/11060826/7773a9da24c3/bjgpmay-2024-74-742-e330-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving access to general practice for and with people with severe and multiple disadvantage: a qualitative study.改善严重多重弱势群体获得全科医疗服务的机会:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Apr 25;74(742):e330-e338. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0244. Print 2024 May.
2
A peer-delivered intervention to reduce harm and improve the well-being of homeless people with problem substance use: the SHARPS feasibility mixed-methods study.一种由同伴提供的干预措施,旨在减少有问题物质使用的无家可归者的伤害并改善其福祉:SHARPS 可行性混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Feb;26(14):1-128. doi: 10.3310/WVVL4786.
3
Hostel support workers' experiences navigating healthcare alongside people experiencing homelessness: a qualitative study in the UK. hostel 支持工作人员在英国与无家可归者一起导航医疗保健的经验:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 23;14(9):e085949. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085949.
4
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.
5
Trauma-informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs.创伤知情共同生产:合作与专业知识相结合,改善有复杂需求的女性获得初级保健的途径。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1895-1914. doi: 10.1111/hex.13795. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
6
Integration, effectiveness and costs of different models of primary health care provision for people who are homeless: an evaluation study.为无家可归者提供不同模式的基层医疗服务的整合、效果和成本:一项评估研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;11(16):1-217. doi: 10.3310/WXUW5103.
7
Provision and accessibility of primary healthcare services for people who are homeless: a qualitative study of patient perspectives in the UK.为无家可归者提供和获取初级医疗保健服务:英国一项基于患者视角的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Aug;69(685):e526-e536. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X704633. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
8
"You know, we can change the services to suit the circumstances of what is happening in the world": a rapid case study of the COVID-19 response across city centre homelessness and health services in Edinburgh, Scotland.“你知道,我们可以根据世界上正在发生的情况来改变服务”:苏格兰爱丁堡市中心无家可归和健康服务应对 COVID-19 的快速案例研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2021 Jun 12;18(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00508-1.
9
Improving access to general practice for people with severe and multiple disadvantage: a realist review protocol (The Connection Study).改善严重和多重弱势群体获得全科医疗服务的机会:一项实在论综述方案(关联研究)
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Oct 11;8:331. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19460.2. eCollection 2023.
10
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Tackling health inequalities together: inclusion health and co-production.共同应对健康不平等问题:包容性健康与共同生产
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Sep 26;74(747):469-471. doi: 10.3399/bjgp24X739365. Print 2024 Oct.
2
Unpacking complexity in addressing the contribution of trauma to women's ill health: a qualitative study of perspectives from general practice.解析导致女性健康不良的创伤因素的复杂性:全科医学视角的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Aug 29;74(746):e604-e609. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0024. Print 2024 Sep.
3
Series: Public engagement with research. Part 3: Sharing power and building trust through partnering with communities in primary care research.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary care micro-teams: an international systematic review of patient and healthcare professional perspectives.基层医疗微团队:患者和医疗专业人员视角的国际系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Aug 31;73(734):e651-e658. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0545. Print 2023 Sep.
2
Trauma-informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs.创伤知情共同生产:合作与专业知识相结合,改善有复杂需求的女性获得初级保健的途径。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1895-1914. doi: 10.1111/hex.13795. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
3
Remote primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic for people experiencing homelessness: a qualitative study.
系列文章:公众参与研究。第 3 部分:通过与初级保健研究中的社区合作,分享权力和建立信任。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2328707. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2328707. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间为无家可归者提供远程初级保健:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jun 30;72(720):e492-e500. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0596. Print 2022 Jul.
4
Access to healthcare for street sex workers in the UK: perspectives and best practice guidance from a national cross-sectional survey of frontline workers.英国街头性工作者获得医疗保健服务的途径:来自一线工作者全国性横断面调查的观点和最佳实践指南。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 11;22(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07581-7.
5
Accessing primary care and the importance of 'human fit': a qualitative participatory case study.获得初级医疗服务以及“人与环境适配”的重要性:一项定性参与式案例研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Apr 28;72(718):e342-e350. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0375. Print 2022 May.
6
Exploring GP work in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation: a secondary analysis.探索社会经济高度贫困地区的全科医生工作:一项二次分析。
BJGP Open. 2021 Dec 14;5(6). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0117. Print 2021.
7
Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review.患者作为健康研究的合作伙伴:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1378-1390. doi: 10.1111/hex.13272. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
8
Reasonable adjustments for people with intellectual disability in acute care: a scoping review of the evidence.急性护理中对智障人士的合理调整:证据的范围审查
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 22;11(2):e039647. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039647.
9
Lost in the shadows: reflections on the dark side of co-production.迷失在阴影中:关于共同生产阴暗面的思考
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 7;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00558-0.
10
Preparing for patient partnership: A scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research.准备患者合作:患者伙伴参与和评估研究的范围综述。
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):523-539. doi: 10.1111/hex.13040. Epub 2020 Mar 10.