• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在伦敦西北部,非住院的高危 COVID-19 患者中,与不治疗相比,sotrovimab 的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。

Comparative effectiveness of sotrovimab versus no treatment in non-hospitalised high-risk COVID-19 patients in north west London: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

GSK, Brentford, UK

Imperial College Health Partners, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 Apr 4;11(1):e002238. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002238.

DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002238
PMID:38575338
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11002339/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We assessed the effectiveness of sotrovimab vs no early COVID-19 treatment in highest-risk COVID-19 patients during Omicron predominance.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study using the Discover dataset in North West London. Included patients were non-hospitalised, aged ≥12 years and met ≥1 National Health Service highest-risk criterion for sotrovimab treatment. We used Cox proportional hazards models to compare HRs of 28-day COVID-19-related hospitalisation/death between highest-risk sotrovimab-treated and untreated patients. Age, renal disease and Omicron subvariant subgroup analyses were performed.

RESULTS

We included 599 sotrovimab-treated patients and 5191 untreated patients. Compared with untreated patients, the risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation/death (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24, 1.06; p=0.07) and the risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.18, 1.00; p=0.051) were both lower in the sotrovimab-treated group; however, statistical significance was not reached. In the ≥65 years and renal disease subgroups, sotrovimab was associated with a significantly reduced risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation, by 89% (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02, 0.82; p=0.03) and 82% (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05, 0.62; p=0.007), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation in sotrovimab-treated patients aged ≥65 years and with renal disease was significantly lower compared with untreated patients. Overall, risk of hospitalisation was also lower for sotrovimab-treated patients, but statistical significance was not reached.

摘要

背景

我们评估了在奥密克戎为主的时期,索特罗维单抗对最高危新冠患者早期新冠治疗的有效性。

方法

这是一项在伦敦西北部的发现数据库中进行的回顾性队列研究。纳入的患者为非住院、年龄≥12 岁且符合索特罗维单抗治疗的国家卫生服务系统最高风险标准之一。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型比较了最高危索特罗维单抗治疗组和未治疗组 28 天内新冠相关住院/死亡的 HR。进行了年龄、肾脏疾病和奥密克戎亚变异亚组分析。

结果

我们纳入了 599 名接受索特罗维单抗治疗的患者和 5191 名未接受治疗的患者。与未治疗的患者相比,索特罗维单抗治疗组的新冠住院/死亡风险(HR 0.50,95%CI 0.24,1.06;p=0.07)和新冠住院风险(HR 0.43,95%CI 0.18,1.00;p=0.051)均较低,但未达到统计学意义。在≥65 岁和肾脏疾病亚组中,索特罗维单抗与新冠住院风险显著降低相关,分别降低 89%(HR 0.11,95%CI 0.02,0.82;p=0.03)和 82%(HR 0.18,95%CI 0.05,0.62;p=0.007)。

结论

与未治疗的患者相比,年龄≥65 岁和患有肾脏疾病的索特罗维单抗治疗患者的新冠住院风险显著降低。总体而言,索特罗维单抗治疗患者的住院风险也较低,但未达到统计学意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e27/11002339/39e301be5fc7/bmjresp-2023-002238f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e27/11002339/39e301be5fc7/bmjresp-2023-002238f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e27/11002339/39e301be5fc7/bmjresp-2023-002238f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of sotrovimab versus no treatment in non-hospitalised high-risk COVID-19 patients in north west London: a retrospective cohort study.在伦敦西北部,非住院的高危 COVID-19 患者中,与不治疗相比,sotrovimab 的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 Apr 4;11(1):e002238. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002238.
2
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 at high risk of disease progression receiving sotrovimab, oral antivirals or no treatment in England: a retrospective cohort study.在英国,高疾病进展风险的 COVID-19 患者接受 sotrovimab、口服抗病毒药物或无治疗的特征和结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2024 Aug;40(8):1323-1334. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2376144. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
3
Real-World Effectiveness of Sotrovimab for the Early Treatment of COVID-19: Evidence from the US National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C).索托维单抗用于新冠早期治疗的真实世界有效性:来自美国国家新冠队列协作组(N3C)的证据
Clin Drug Investig. 2024 Mar;44(3):183-198. doi: 10.1007/s40261-024-01344-4. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
4
Characteristics and outcomes of patients treated with sotrovimab to prevent progression to severe COVID-19 in Belgium.比利时使用 sotrovimab 治疗以预防 COVID-19 进展为重症的患者的特征和结局。
Acta Clin Belg. 2024 Jun;79(3):174-183. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2024.2381272. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
5
Characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 patients presumed to be treated with sotrovimab in NHS hospitals in England.在英格兰国民保健服务体系(NHS)医院中,推测接受索托维单抗治疗的新冠病毒疾病(COVID-19)患者的特征及治疗结果
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Apr 22;24(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09311-2.
6
Real-world effectiveness of sotrovimab in preventing hospitalization and mortality in high-risk patients with COVID-19 in the United States: A cohort study from the Mayo Clinic electronic health records.美国真实世界中 sotrovimab 预防 COVID-19 高危患者住院和死亡的效果:来自梅奥诊所电子健康记录的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 16;19(7):e0304822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304822. eCollection 2024.
7
Real-world effectiveness of sotrovimab for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection during Omicron BA.2 and BA.5 subvariant predominance: a systematic literature review.奥密克戎 BA.2 和 BA.5 亚型为主流行期间,索特罗维单抗治疗 SARS-CoV-2 感染的真实世界疗效:系统文献回顾。
Infection. 2024 Oct;52(5):1839-1861. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02245-6. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
8
Comparative effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir versus sotrovimab and molnupiravir for preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes in non-hospitalised high-risk patients during Omicron waves: observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform.在奥密克戎毒株流行期间,使用OpenSAFELY平台进行的观察性队列研究:评估奈玛特韦/利托那韦与索托维单抗和莫努匹韦相比,在预防非住院高危患者出现严重新冠病毒病结局方面的有效性。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Oct 8;34:100741. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100741. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 at high risk of disease progression receiving sotrovimab, oral antivirals, or no treatment: a retrospective cohort study.接受 sotrovimab、口服抗病毒药物或未接受治疗的 COVID-19 高疾病进展风险患者的特征和结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jul 4;24(1):670. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09576-7.
10
Evaluating in vivo effectiveness of sotrovimab for the treatment of Omicron subvariant BA.2 versus BA.1: a multicentre, retrospective cohort study.评估索特罗维单抗治疗奥密克戎亚变体 BA.2 与 BA.1 的体内疗效:一项多中心、回顾性队列研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2024 Jan 24;17(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06695-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world evidence: state-of-the-art and future perspectives.真实世界证据:现状与未来展望。
J Comp Eff Res. 2025 Apr;14(4):e240130. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0130. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
2
Real-world effectiveness of sotrovimab for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection during Omicron BA.2 and BA.5 subvariant predominance: a systematic literature review.奥密克戎 BA.2 和 BA.5 亚型为主流行期间,索特罗维单抗治疗 SARS-CoV-2 感染的真实世界疗效:系统文献回顾。
Infection. 2024 Oct;52(5):1839-1861. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02245-6. Epub 2024 Apr 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 at high risk of disease progression receiving sotrovimab, oral antivirals or no treatment in England: a retrospective cohort study.在英国,高疾病进展风险的 COVID-19 患者接受 sotrovimab、口服抗病毒药物或无治疗的特征和结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2024 Aug;40(8):1323-1334. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2376144. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
2
Characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 patients presumed to be treated with sotrovimab in NHS hospitals in England.在英格兰国民保健服务体系(NHS)医院中,推测接受索托维单抗治疗的新冠病毒疾病(COVID-19)患者的特征及治疗结果
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Apr 22;24(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09311-2.
3
Effectiveness of Sotrovimab in Preventing COVID-19-Related Hospitalizations or Deaths Among US Veterans During Omicron BA.1.
索托维单抗在预防美国退伍军人中奥密克戎BA.1变异株期间与COVID-19相关的住院或死亡方面的有效性
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Dec 2;10(12):ofad605. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad605. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Comparative effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir versus sotrovimab and molnupiravir for preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes in non-hospitalised high-risk patients during Omicron waves: observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform.在奥密克戎毒株流行期间,使用OpenSAFELY平台进行的观察性队列研究:评估奈玛特韦/利托那韦与索托维单抗和莫努匹韦相比,在预防非住院高危患者出现严重新冠病毒病结局方面的有效性。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Oct 8;34:100741. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100741. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Comparative effectiveness of sotrovimab and molnupiravir for preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes in patients on kidney replacement therapy: observational study using the OpenSAFELY-UKRR and SRR databases.索托维单抗和莫努匹拉韦在预防接受肾脏替代治疗的患者出现严重 COVID-19 结局方面的比较有效性:使用 OpenSAFELY-UKRR 和 SRR 数据库的观察性研究
Clin Kidney J. 2023 Aug 29;16(11):2048-2058. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad184. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Real-world effectiveness of sotrovimab for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection during Omicron BA.2 subvariant predominance: a systematic literature review.奥密克戎 BA.2 亚变体流行期间索特罗维单抗治疗 SARS-CoV-2 感染的真实世界疗效:系统文献回顾。
Infection. 2024 Feb;52(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s15010-023-02098-5. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
7
Real-world Effectiveness of Molnupiravir and Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir as Treatments for COVID-19 in Patients at High Risk.莫努匹韦和奈玛特韦/利托那韦在高危 COVID-19 患者中的真实世界疗效。
J Infect Dis. 2023 Dec 20;228(12):1667-1674. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad324.
8
Risk prediction of covid-19 related death or hospital admission in adults testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection during the omicron wave in England (QCOVID4): cohort study.奥密克戎变异株流行期间英格兰 SARS-CoV-2 感染阳性成年人的新冠相关死亡或住院风险预测(QCOVID4):队列研究。
BMJ. 2023 Jun 21;381:e072976. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072976.
9
Comparison of the risk of hospitalisation among BA.1 and BA.2 COVID-19 cases treated with sotrovimab in the community in England.比较在英格兰社区接受 sotrovimab 治疗的 BA.1 和 BA.2 COVID-19 病例住院风险。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2023 May;17(5):e13150. doi: 10.1111/irv.13150.
10
Real-World Effectiveness of Sotrovimab for the Early Treatment of COVID-19 During SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron Waves in the USA.索托维单抗在美国SARS-CoV-2德尔塔和奥密克戎毒株流行期间对COVID-19早期治疗的真实世界有效性
Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Feb;12(2):607-621. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00755-0. Epub 2023 Jan 11.