Hematology-BMT Centre, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
EBMT Statistical Unit, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Br J Haematol. 2024 Jun;204(6):2365-2377. doi: 10.1111/bjh.19448. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains an option for tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) in first chronic phase (CP1) and high-risk patients with advanced disease phases. In this European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry-based study of 1686 CML patients undergoing first allo-HCT between 2012 and 2019, outcomes were evaluated according to donor type, particularly focusing on mismatched related donors (MMRDs). Median age at allo-HCT was 46 years (IQR 36-55). Disease status was CP1 in 43%, second CP (CP2) or later in 27%, accelerated phase in 12% and blast crisis in 18%. Donor type was matched related (MRD) in 39.2%, MMRD in 8.1%, matched unrelated (MUD) in 40.2%, and mismatched unrelated (MMUD) in 12.6%. In 4 years, overall survival (OS) for MRD, MMRD, MUD and MMUD was 61%, 56%, 63% and 59% (p = 0.21); relapse-free survival (RFS) was 48%, 42%, 52% and 46% (p = 0.03); cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 33%, 37%, 27% and 30% (p = 0.07); non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 19%, 21%, 21% and 24% (p = 0.21); and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD)-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 16%, 18%, 22% and 15% (p = 0.05) respectively. On multivariate analysis, MMRD use associated with longer engraftment times and higher risk of graft failure compared to MRD or MUD. There was no statistical evidence that MMRD use associated with different OS, RFS and incidence of GvHD compared to other donor types.
同种异体造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)仍然是初诊慢性髓性白血病(CML)和处于晚期疾病阶段的高危患者的一线治疗选择。在这项基于欧洲血液和骨髓移植学会(EBMT)注册的研究中,纳入了 1686 例于 2012 年至 2019 年间接受首次 allo-HCT 的 CML 患者,根据供体类型评估了患者的结局,特别是关注了不合型亲缘供者(MMRD)。allo-HCT 时的中位年龄为 46 岁(IQR 36-55)。疾病状态为初诊慢性期(CP1)的患者占 43%,CP2 或更晚期的患者占 27%,加速期的患者占 12%,急变期的患者占 18%。供体类型为匹配亲缘供者(MRD)的患者占 39.2%,MMRD 的患者占 8.1%,匹配无关供者(MUD)的患者占 40.2%,不合型无关供者(MMUD)的患者占 12.6%。在 4 年时,MRD、MMRD、MUD 和 MMUD 的总生存(OS)率分别为 61%、56%、63%和 59%(p=0.21);无复发生存(RFS)率分别为 48%、42%、52%和 46%(p=0.03);累积复发率(CIR)分别为 33%、37%、27%和 30%(p=0.07);非复发死亡率(NRM)分别为 19%、21%、21%和 24%(p=0.21);移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)-无复发生存(GRFS)率分别为 16%、18%、22%和 15%(p=0.05)。多变量分析显示,与 MRD 或 MUD 相比,使用 MMRD 与更长的植入时间和更高的移植物失败风险相关。没有统计学证据表明,与其他供体类型相比,使用 MMRD 与不同的 OS、RFS 和 GvHD 发生率相关。