Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
J Correct Health Care. 2024 Jun;30(3):172-197. doi: 10.1089/jchc.23.10.0090. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
People experiencing incarceration (PEI) have poorer COVID-19 clinical outcomes compared with the general population. Many interventions were implemented in incarceration facilities to mitigate the burden of COVID-19. This systematic review seeks to analyze the effectiveness of these interventions. Twenty-two studies were included. Reduction of the incarcerated population/interfacility transfers, cohorting of new and infectious incarcerated people, mass asymptomatic testing (despite often low uptake), hygiene measures, and prioritization of PEI in vaccine policy had some evidence of effectiveness at reducing transmission and risk of COVID-19 in incarceration facilities. Visitation suspension had conflicting evidence of effectiveness. Studies were of low or medium quality. Inadequate control of confounding variables limited the reliability and validity of conclusions drawn. Many studies relied on retrospective, third-party data. Higher quality research is required.
被监禁者(PEI)的 COVID-19 临床结局比一般人群更差。许多干预措施已在监禁场所实施,以减轻 COVID-19 的负担。本系统评价旨在分析这些干预措施的效果。共纳入 22 项研究。减少被监禁人数/设施转移、对新感染的被监禁者进行分组、大规模无症状检测(尽管参与率通常较低)、卫生措施,以及在疫苗政策中优先考虑被监禁者,这些措施在减少监禁场所 COVID-19 的传播和风险方面有一定的效果。暂停探视的效果则存在争议。研究质量较低或中等。对混杂变量的控制不足限制了结论的可靠性和有效性。许多研究依赖于回顾性的第三方数据。需要进行高质量的研究。