• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的心脏手术:趋势与结果。

Cardiac Surgery After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Trends and Outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

STS Research and Analytic Center, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 Jul;118(1):155-162. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.03.024. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.03.024
PMID:38580202
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reports of cardiac operations after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and early TAVR explantation are increasing. The purpose of this report is to document trends and outcomes of cardiac surgery after initial TAVR.

METHODS

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database was queried for all adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery after a previously placed TAVR between January 2012 and March 2023. This identified an overall cohort and 2 subcohorts: nonaortic valve operations and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) after previous TAVR. Cohorts were examined with descriptive statistics, trend analyses, and 30-day outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 5457 patients who were identified, 2485 (45.5%) underwent non-SAVR cardiac surgery, and 2972 (54.5%) underwent SAVR. The frequency of cardiac surgery after TAVR increased 4235.3% overall and 144.6% per year throughout the study period. The incidence of operative mortality and stroke were 15.5% and 4.5%, respectively. Existing The Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk models performed poorly, because observed-to-expected mortality ratios were significantly >1.0. Among those undergoing SAVR after TAVR, increasing preoperative surgical urgency, age, dialysis, need for SAVR, and concomitant procedures were associated with increased mortality, whereas type of TAVR explant was not.

CONCLUSIONS

The need for cardiac surgery, including redo SAVR after TAVR, is increasing rapidly. Risks are higher, and outcomes are worse than predicted. These data should closely inform heart team decisions if TAVR is considered at lowering age and risk profiles in the absence of longitudinal evidence.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后和早期 TAVR 取出后的心脏手术报告正在增加。本报告的目的是记录初始 TAVR 后心脏手术的趋势和结果。

方法

通过 2012 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月期间在 Society of Thoracic Surgeons 成人心脏手术数据库中查询所有先前接受 TAVR 后接受心脏手术的成年患者,确定了一个总体队列和两个亚队列:非主动脉瓣手术和先前 TAVR 后行外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)。使用描述性统计、趋势分析和 30 天结果对队列进行检查。

结果

在确定的 5457 名患者中,2485 名(45.5%)患者接受了非 SAVR 心脏手术,2972 名(54.5%)患者接受了 SAVR。TAVR 后心脏手术的频率总体增加了 4235.3%,每年增加 144.6%。手术死亡率和中风的发生率分别为 15.5%和 4.5%。现有的 Society of Thoracic Surgeons 风险模型表现不佳,因为观察到的与预期死亡率比值明显大于 1.0。在 TAVR 后接受 SAVR 的患者中,术前手术紧急程度、年龄、透析、需要 SAVR 和伴随手术的增加与死亡率的增加相关,而 TAVR 瓣膜的类型则无关。

结论

需要进行心脏手术,包括 TAVR 后再次行 SAVR,这一需求正在迅速增加。风险更高,结果比预测的更差。如果没有纵向证据,考虑在年龄和风险状况较低的情况下进行 TAVR,这些数据应密切告知心脏团队决策。

相似文献

1
Cardiac Surgery After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Trends and Outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的心脏手术:趋势与结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 Jul;118(1):155-162. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.03.024. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
2
Reoperation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后再次手术:胸外科医生学会数据库分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul 13;13(13):1515-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.029. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
3
Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus isolated redo surgical aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中瓣中瓣技术与单独再次开胸主动脉瓣置换术的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Oct;168(4):1003-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.06.014. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
4
Transcatheter or Surgical Replacement for Failed Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves.经导管或外科手术置换生物瓣衰败的主动脉瓣。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Jul 1;9(7):631-639. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.1049.
5
Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement After Prior Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.既往经导管主动脉瓣置换术后再次行外科主动脉瓣置换术与初次外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Apr 24;16(8):942-953. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.03.015.
6
The association of transcatheter aortic valve replacement availability and hospital aortic valve replacement volume and mortality in the United States.美国经导管主动脉瓣置换术的可及性与医院主动脉瓣置换手术量及死亡率的关联
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Dec;98(6):2016-22; discussion 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.07.051. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
7
Temporal Changes in Mortality After Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Retrospective Analysis of US Medicare Patients (2012-2019).经导管主动脉瓣置换术和外科主动脉瓣置换术后死亡率的时间变化:美国医疗保险患者的回顾性分析(2012-2019 年)。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Oct 19;10(20):e021748. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.021748. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
8
Isolated Redo Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Valve Replacement.单纯主动脉瓣置换术与经导管主动脉瓣置换术中瓣中瓣技术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Aug;112(2):539-545. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.08.048. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
9
Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的时间趋势和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1811-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.037.
10
Surgical Explantation of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Bioprostheses: A Statewide Experience.经导管主动脉瓣生物瓣假体的外科取出术:全州范围的经验。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr;14(4):e009927. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009927. Epub 2021 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the future role of robotic aortic valve replacement.外科主动脉瓣置换术与经导管主动脉瓣置换术:机器人辅助主动脉瓣置换术的未来作用
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 May 31;14(3):182-191. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-ravr-0181. Epub 2025 May 29.
2
Facing Complexity: Outcomes of Surgical Bailouts from Complications of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in a Single High-Volume Center.面对复杂性:单一高容量中心经导管主动脉瓣置换术并发症的外科补救结果
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 28;14(9):3051. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093051.
3
Clinical outcomes of TAVR explant stratified by original risk profile: insights from 110 TAVR explants.
根据原始风险状况分层的经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)瓣膜取出的临床结果:来自110例TAVR瓣膜取出病例的见解
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Mar 31;14(2):122-130. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-etavr-0104. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
4
The future direction of post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement reinterventions: insights from the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后再干预的未来方向:来自经导管瓣膜治疗注册研究的见解
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Mar 31;14(2):154-156. doi: 10.21037/acs-2025-etavr-0019. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
5
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement explant various techniques.经导管主动脉瓣置换术取出采用多种技术。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Mar 31;14(2):157-164. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-etavr-12. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
6
The current state of redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and limitations: why TAVR explant is important as the valve reintervention strategy.再次经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的现状及局限性:为何TAVR瓣膜取出作为瓣膜再次干预策略很重要。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Mar 31;14(2):98-111. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-etavr-0149. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
7
The future direction of post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement re-interventions: insights from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后再干预的未来方向:来自胸外科医师协会国家数据库的见解
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Mar 31;14(2):151-153. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-etavr-0136. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
8
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low- to intermediate-risk patients: a meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data.低至中度风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:对重构事件发生时间数据的荟萃分析
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Mar 31;14(2):73-84. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-etavr-0096. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
9
The current state of transcatheter aortic valve replacement explant: an updated systematic review.经导管主动脉瓣置换术取出物的当前状态:一项更新的系统评价
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Mar 31;14(2):85-97. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-etavr-0075. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
10
Could the age threshold for TAVI be relaxed to below 65 years? Pros and cons.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的年龄阈值能否放宽至65岁以下?利弊分析。
EuroIntervention. 2025 Apr 21;21(8):e387-e389. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00071.