• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接作用抗病毒药物治疗慢性丙型肝炎后健康相关生活质量的最小临床重要差异:ANRS CO22 HEPATHER 队列(PROQOL-HCV)。

Minimal clinically important differences in health-related quality of life after treatment with direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C: ANRS CO22 HEPATHER cohort (PROQOL-HCV).

机构信息

Aix Marseille Univ, Inserm, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France.

Faculté de Médecine, Inserm UMR 1252 SESSTIM, Aix-Marseille Univ, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille, France.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2024 Jun;33(6):1527-1540. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03622-2. Epub 2024 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-024-03622-2
PMID:38580786
Abstract

PURPOSE

Patient Reported Outcomes Quality of Life survey for HCV (PROQOL-HCV) is a specific tool developed to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving direct-acting antivirals (DAA). Thresholds for clinically meaningful changes in PROQOL-HCV scores should be documented to improve the tool's use in clinical practice. This study aimed to estimate the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) in PROQOL-HCV scores before and after HCV cure by DAA among participants in the prospective cohort ANRS-CO22 HEPATHER.

METHODS

Data from 460 chronic HCV patients were collected at DAA initiation (baseline) and 24 weeks after treatment end. MCIDs were estimated for the six HRQoL dimensions (Physical Health (PH), Emotional Health (EH), Future Uncertainty (FU), Intimate Relationships (IR), Social Health (SH), and Cognitive Functioning (CF)) using two approaches: anchor-based and score distribution-based. Each MCID was estimated for improvement/deterioration both globally and separately for patients with a baseline PRQoL-HCV score ≤ 50 (group1) and patients with a baseline PRQoL-HCV score > 50 (group2).

RESULTS

The pooled MCIDs for improvement/deterioration globally, in group1, and in group2, respectively, were as follows: 8.8/- 7.6, 9.7/- 9.5, and 6.0/- 6.9 for PH; 7.1/- 4.6, 7.7/- 9.6, and 6.6/- 6.7 for EH; 6.7/- 6.7, 8.2/- 8.2, and 6.0/- 6.0 for FU; 7.0/- 7.0, 5.4/- 5.4, and 6.2/- 6.2 for IR; 7.7/- 7.7, 8.6/- 8.6, and 6.5/- 6.5 for SH; 7.3/- 5.6, 9.1/- 8.0, and 6.5/- 6.3 for CF.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall MCID for the PROQOL-HCV scores ranged from 6.7 to 8.8 for improvement and from - 7.7 to - 4.6 for deterioration. The effect of DAA on PROQOL-HCV scores seemed particularly beneficial for patients with lower baseline scores. This subgroup could be motivated to take DAA if they are informed of the benefits for their HRQoL.

摘要

目的

患者报告的 HCV 生存质量调查问卷(PROQOL-HCV)是一种专门用于评估慢性丙型肝炎患者接受直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)治疗后健康相关生存质量(HRQoL)的工具。为了提高该工具在临床实践中的应用价值,应记录 PROQOL-HCV 评分中临床有意义变化的阈值。本研究旨在通过前瞻性队列研究 ANRS-CO22 HEPATHER 中的参与者,估计 HCV 经 DAA 治愈前后 PROQOL-HCV 评分的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。

方法

在 DAA 起始时(基线)和治疗结束后 24 周,收集了 460 例慢性 HCV 患者的数据。使用锚定和评分分布两种方法,对六个 HRQoL 维度(身体状况(PH)、情绪健康(EH)、未来不确定性(FU)、亲密关系(IR)、社会健康(SH)和认知功能(CF))的 MCID 进行估计。对于全球范围以及基线 PROQOL-HCV 评分≤50(组 1)和基线 PROQOL-HCV 评分>50(组 2)的患者,分别对改善/恶化的每个 MCID 进行了估计。

结果

总体而言,改善/恶化的 MCID 分别为 8.8/-7.6、9.7/-9.5 和 6.0/-6.9,用于 PH;改善/恶化的 MCID 分别为 7.1/-4.6、7.7/-9.6 和 6.6/-6.7,用于 EH;改善/恶化的 MCID 分别为 6.7/-6.7、8.2/-8.2 和 6.0/-6.0,用于 FU;改善/恶化的 MCID 分别为 7.0/-7.0、5.4/-5.4 和 6.2/-6.2,用于 IR;改善/恶化的 MCID 分别为 7.7/-7.7、8.6/-8.6 和 6.5/-6.5,用于 SH;改善/恶化的 MCID 分别为 7.3/-5.6、9.1/-8.0 和 6.5/-6.3,用于 CF。

结论

PROQOL-HCV 评分的总体 MCID 范围为改善时的 6.7 至 8.8,恶化时的-7.7 至-4.6。DAA 对 PROQOL-HCV 评分的影响似乎对基线评分较低的患者特别有益。如果告知这些患者 HRQoL 的获益,那么该亚组可能会被激励接受 DAA 治疗。

相似文献

1
Minimal clinically important differences in health-related quality of life after treatment with direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C: ANRS CO22 HEPATHER cohort (PROQOL-HCV).直接作用抗病毒药物治疗慢性丙型肝炎后健康相关生活质量的最小临床重要差异:ANRS CO22 HEPATHER 队列(PROQOL-HCV)。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Jun;33(6):1527-1540. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03622-2. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
2
Impaired health-related quality of life in the HCV cure era: who is concerned? (ANRS CO22 HEPATHER French cohort).在 HCV 治愈时代,健康相关生活质量受损:谁受到影响?(ANRS CO22 HEPATHER 法国队列)。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Dec;32(12):3427-3438. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03496-w. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
3
Only partial improvement in health-related quality of life after treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection with direct acting antivirals in a real-world setting-results from the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R).直接作用抗病毒药物治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染的真实世界疗效:仅部分改善健康相关生活质量——德国丙型肝炎注册研究(DHC-R)的结果。
J Viral Hepat. 2021 Aug;28(8):1206-1218. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13546. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
4
Hepatitis C virus cure from direct-acting antivirals and mortality: Are people with and without a history of injection drug use in the same boat? (ANRS CO22 Hepather cohort).直接作用抗病毒药物治愈丙型肝炎病毒和死亡率:有和没有注射吸毒史的人情况是否相同?(ANRS CO22 Hepather 队列)。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2024 Mar;43(3):718-731. doi: 10.1111/dar.13802. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
5
Absence of impact of direct acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus on recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma tumor growth in the AFEF/ANRS CO22 Hepather cohort.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎对 AFEF/ANRS CO22 Hepather 队列中复发性肝细胞癌肿瘤生长影响的缺失。
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan;45(1):101459. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2020.04.022. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
6
Health-related quality of Life in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving Sofosbuvir-based treatment, with and without Interferon: a prospective observational study in Egypt.接受基于索磷布韦治疗的慢性丙型肝炎患者的健康相关生活质量,有无干扰素:埃及的一项前瞻性观察研究
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 21;17(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0581-1.
7
Male Sexual Dysfunction Among Egyptian Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection Before and After Direct-Acting Antiviral Drugs.埃及慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染患者直接抗病毒药物治疗前后的男性性功能障碍。
J Sex Med. 2019 Mar;16(3):402-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.01.309.
8
Clinical outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis C after direct-acting antiviral treatment: a prospective cohort study.直接作用抗病毒治疗后慢性丙型肝炎患者的临床结局:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet. 2019 Apr 6;393(10179):1453-1464. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32111-1. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
9
Health-related quality of life and fatigue in patients with chronic hepatitis C with therapy with direct-acting antivirals agents interferon-free.慢性丙型肝炎患者直接作用抗病毒药物无干扰素治疗的健康相关生活质量和疲劳。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 19;15(8):e0237005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237005. eCollection 2020.
10
Impact of Interferon-Based Treatment on Quality of Life and Work-Related Productivity of Korean Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C.基于干扰素治疗对韩国慢性丙型肝炎患者生活质量和工作生产力的影响。
Gut Liver. 2020 May 15;14(3):368-376. doi: 10.5009/gnl18100.

本文引用的文献

1
A French Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L.一个用于 EQ-5D-5L 的法国价值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Apr;38(4):413-425. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00876-4.
2
The minimal clinically important difference raised the significance of outcome effects above the statistical level, with methodological implications for future studies.最小临床重要差异提高了结局效应的统计学意义,对未来研究具有方法学意义。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;82:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.016. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
3
Minimal important change (MIC) based on a predictive modeling approach was more precise than MIC based on ROC analysis.
基于预测模型方法的最小有意义变化 (MIC) 比基于 ROC 分析的 MIC 更精确。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;68(12):1388-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
4
Patient-reported outcomes assessment in chronic hepatitis C treated with sofosbuvir and ribavirin: the VALENCE study.索磷布韦和利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎的患者报告结局评估:VALENCE 研究。
J Hepatol. 2014 Aug;61(2):228-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 5.
5
Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs.计算并报告效应量以促进累积科学:t检验和方差分析实用入门指南
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 26;4:863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863.
6
Minimal clinically meaningful differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 scales in brain cancer patients.脑癌患者 EORTC QLQ-C30 和 EORTC QLQ-BN20 量表的最小临床有意义差异。
Ann Oncol. 2011 Sep;22(9):2107-2112. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq726. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
7
The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference.最小可检测变化不能可靠地替代最小有意义差异。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jan;63(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.024. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
8
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.确定患者报告结局的反应性和最小重要差异的推荐方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
9
Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods.理解最小临床重要差异:概念与方法综述
Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):541-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008. Epub 2007 Apr 2.
10
Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life.定义健康相关生活质量中具有临床意义的变化。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 May;56(5):395-407. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00044-1.