Shipman Joshua, Karfunkle Michael, Zhu Hongbin, Zhuo You, Chen Kang, Patabandige Milani, Wu Di, Oyugi Mercy, Kerr Richard, Yang Kui, Rogstad Sarah
Division of Complex Drug Analysis, Office of Testing and Research, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Division of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Office of Testing and Research, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2024 May;416(13):3127-3137. doi: 10.1007/s00216-024-05261-5. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) represent the largest class of therapeutic protein drug products. mAb glycosylation produces a heterogeneous, analytically challenging distribution of glycoforms that typically should be adequately characterized because glycosylation-based product quality attributes (PQAs) can impact product quality, immunogenicity, and efficacy. In this study, two products were compared using a panel of analytical methods. Two high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) workflows were used to analyze N-glycans, while nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was used to generate monosaccharide fingerprints. These state-of-the-art techniques were compared to conventional analysis using hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) coupled with fluorescence detection (FLD). The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed along with a comparison of the identified glycan distributions. The results demonstrated agreement across all methods for major glycoforms, demonstrating how confidence in glycan characterization is increased by combining orthogonal analytical methodologies. The full panel of methods used represents a diverse toolbox that can be selected from based on the needs for a specific product or analysis.
单克隆抗体(mAb)是治疗性蛋白质药物产品中最大的一类。mAb糖基化产生了糖型的异质性分布,这在分析上具有挑战性,通常应该对其进行充分表征,因为基于糖基化的产品质量属性(PQA)会影响产品质量、免疫原性和疗效。在本研究中,使用一组分析方法对两种产品进行了比较。使用两种高分辨率质谱(HRMS)工作流程分析N-聚糖,同时使用核磁共振(NMR)生成单糖指纹图谱。将这些先进技术与使用亲水相互作用色谱(HILIC)结合荧光检测(FLD)的传统分析方法进行了比较。讨论了每种方法的优缺点,并比较了所鉴定的聚糖分布。结果表明,所有方法对主要糖型的分析结果一致,这表明通过结合正交分析方法可以提高对聚糖表征的可信度。所使用的全套方法代表了一个多样化的工具箱,可以根据特定产品或分析的需求从中进行选择。