Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.
Department of Family Medicine at Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.
Int J Med Educ. 2024 Apr 5;15:37-43. doi: 10.5116/ijme.6607.27a6.
A pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted at our institution's simulation center with 32 first year medical students from a single medical institution. Participants were randomly divided into two equal groups and completed an educational module the identification and pathophysiology of five common cardiac sounds. The control group utilized traditional education methods, while the interventional group incorporated multisensory stimuli. Afterwards, participants listened to randomly selected cardiac sounds and competency data was collected through a multiple-choice post-assessment in both groups. Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the data.
Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher in the multisensory group (Mdn=100%) compared to the control group (Mdn=60%) on the post-assessment (U=73.5, p<0.042). Likewise, knowledge acquisition was substantially better in the multisensory group (Mdn=80%) than in the control group (Mdn=50%) (U= 49, p<0.031).
These findings suggest the incorporation of multisensory stimuli significantly improves cardiac auscultation competency. Given its cost-effectiveness and simplicity, this approach offers a viable alternative to more expensive simulation technologies like the Harvey simulator, particularly in settings with limited resources. Consequently, this teaching modality holds promise for global applicability, addressing the worldwide deterioration in cardiac auscultation skills and potentially leading to better patient outcomes. Future studies should broaden the sample size, span multiple institutions, and investigate long-term retention rates.
我们在机构的模拟中心进行了一项试点随机对照试验,参与者为来自单一医疗机构的 32 名一年级医学生。将参与者随机分为两组,两组均完成了一项关于识别和理解五种常见心音的病理生理学的教育模块。对照组采用传统教育方法,而干预组则采用多感官刺激。之后,参与者随机听取心音,并在两组中通过多项选择后评估收集能力数据。使用曼-惠特尼 U 检验分析数据。
使用曼-惠特尼 U 检验对数据进行分析。在多感官组中,诊断准确性明显更高(Mdn=100%),而在对照组中(Mdn=60%)(U=73.5,p<0.042)。同样,在多感官组中,知识获取明显优于对照组(Mdn=80%),而在对照组中(Mdn=50%)(U=49,p<0.031)。
这些发现表明,多感官刺激的结合显著提高了心脏听诊能力。鉴于其成本效益和简单性,这种方法提供了一种可行的替代方案,替代更昂贵的模拟技术,如 Harvey 模拟器,特别是在资源有限的环境中。因此,这种教学模式具有全球适用性的潜力,可以解决全球范围内心脏听诊技能的恶化问题,并可能带来更好的患者结局。未来的研究应该扩大样本量,跨越多个机构,并调查长期保留率。