Muribushi Okinawa Center for Teaching Hospitals.
Okinawa Clinical Simulation Center, University of the Ryukyus Hospital.
Int J Med Educ. 2020 May 20;11:107-110. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5eb6.70c6.
To evaluate the effect of a sound simulation lesson to improve cardiac auscultation skills among junior doctors.
This study is based on the design of test comparison before and after educational intervention using a convenient sample. For 50 junior doctors in Japan, diagnostic accuracy before and after a sound simulation lesson for cardiac auscultation skills was compared. There were 15 doctors who experienced cardiology rotation. The lesson used seven abnormal cardiac recordings (third heart sound, double gallop, aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, mitral stenosis, mitral regurgitation, and pericardial friction rub). At tests before and after the lesson, the doctors listened to random sound outputs of the same seven recordings, chose diagnostic findings from multiple-choice items, and obtained individual diagnostic accuracy based on the total number of choosing correct findings. Top 10 doctors obtaining the greatest individual accuracy received a commendation.
Pre-lesson diagnostic accuracy was not different between doctors with cardiology rotation training (total diagnostic accuracy of the group, 27/105 [26%]) and those without cardiology rotation (70/245 [29%]). Compared to pre-lesson, post-lesson total diagnostic accuracy significantly improved with about two-folds (97/350 [28%] vs 170/350 [61%]; McNemar Test, p<0.0001). The improvement was significant for double gallop (5/50 [10%] vs. 15/50 [30%]), mitral stenosis (0/50 [0%] vs. 6/50 [12%]), and pericardial friction rub (1/50 [2%] vs. 35/50 [70%]).
The use of a simple sound simulation lesson may help junior doctors to learn cardiac auscultation skills. Clinician educators are encouraged to use this strategy in addition to cardiology rotation training.
评估声音模拟课程对提高初级医生心脏听诊技能的效果。
本研究基于教育干预前后测试比较的设计,采用方便样本。对日本的 50 名初级医生进行研究,比较了心脏听诊技能的声音模拟课程前后的诊断准确性。其中有 15 名医生有心脏病学轮转经验。该课程使用了七种异常心脏录音(第三心音、双重奔马律、主动脉瓣狭窄、主动脉瓣反流、二尖瓣狭窄、二尖瓣反流和心包摩擦音)。在课程前后的测试中,医生们随机听取了这七种录音的声音输出,从多项选择题中选择诊断结果,并根据选择正确结果的总数获得个人诊断准确性。获得最高个人准确性的前 10 名医生将获得表彰。
在课程前,有心脏病学轮转培训的医生(该组的总诊断准确率为 27/105[26%])与没有心脏病学轮转培训的医生(70/245[29%])之间的诊断准确性没有差异。与课程前相比,课程后的总诊断准确性显著提高了两倍左右(97/350[28%]比 170/350[61%];McNemar 检验,p<0.0001)。双奔马律(5/50[10%]比 15/50[30%])、二尖瓣狭窄(0/50[0%]比 6/50[12%])和心包摩擦音(1/50[2%]比 35/50[70%])的改善有统计学意义。
使用简单的声音模拟课程可能有助于初级医生学习心脏听诊技能。临床医生教育者鼓励在心脏病学轮转培训之外使用这种策略。