Imaging Sciences and Interventional Radiology, Sree Chitra Thirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695011, India.
Neuroradiology. 2024 Jul;66(7):1203-1212. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03342-x. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
Endovascular treatment of direct carotid cavernous fistula (DCCF) requires invasive diagnostic cerebral angiography for diagnosis and planning; however, a less invasive modality like magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) can be useful, especially in high-risk cases. This single-centre study evaluated a newer MR angiography (MRA) sequence, silent MRA and the traditional time of flight (TOF) MRA for pre-procedural treatment planning of DCCF.
All consecutive DCCF patients who underwent TOF, silent MRA and diagnostic cerebral angiography were included in the study. Angiographic features like rent size, location, draining veins and collateral communicating arteries were analysed and compared between the two MRA sequences, with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the gold standard.
Fifteen patients were included in the study. TOF MRA exhibited better sensitivity (76.9% vs 69.2%) in identifying the rent location, correctly pinpointing the location in 93.3% compared to 73.3% with silent MRA. Both MRA sequences showed good agreement with DSA for primary sac and rent size. TOF MRA correctly identified 86.2% of 210 total venous structures compared to 96% by silent MRA. Silent MRA demonstrated higher sensitivity (90% vs 76%) and accuracy (87.69 vs 94.36) in visualisation of involved veins compared to TOF MRA.
Arterial characteristics of DCCF like rent location and rent size were better assessed by TOF MRA. Although both MRA identified venous features, silent MRA correlated better with DSA irrespective of the size and proximity to the site of the fistula. Combining both sequences can evaluate various angioarchitectural features of DCCF useful for therapeutic planning.
直接颈动脉海绵窦瘘(DCCF)的血管内治疗需要进行有创性诊断性脑血管造影以进行诊断和规划;然而,磁共振血管造影(MRA)等微创方式可能会有所帮助,尤其是在高风险病例中。本单中心研究评估了一种新的磁共振血管造影(MRA)序列,即静默 MRA 和传统的时间飞跃(TOF)MRA,用于 DCCF 的术前治疗计划。
所有连续接受 TOF、静默 MRA 和诊断性脑血管造影的 DCCF 患者均纳入本研究。分析并比较了两种 MRA 序列的血管造影特征,如瘘口大小、位置、引流静脉和侧支交通动脉,并以数字减影血管造影(DSA)作为金标准。
本研究纳入了 15 例患者。TOF MRA 在识别瘘口位置方面具有更好的敏感性(76.9%比 69.2%),正确定位瘘口的位置的比例为 93.3%,而静默 MRA 为 73.3%。两种 MRA 序列在评估主囊和瘘口大小时与 DSA 具有良好的一致性。TOF MRA 正确识别了 210 条总静脉结构中的 86.2%,而静默 MRA 为 96%。静默 MRA 在显示受累静脉方面具有更高的敏感性(90%比 76%)和准确性(87.69%比 94.36%)。
TOF MRA 可更好地评估 DCCF 的动脉特征,如瘘口位置和瘘口大小。尽管两种 MRA 均能识别静脉特征,但静默 MRA 与 DSA 的相关性更好,与瘘口的大小和位置无关。结合两种序列可以评估 DCCF 的各种血管解剖结构特征,有助于治疗计划。