Department of Pharmacology, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.
Independent Researcher, Kengeri, Bangalore, India.
Inflammopharmacology. 2024 Jun;32(3):1759-1775. doi: 10.1007/s10787-024-01460-9. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
AIM: This study was aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of two oral Symptomatic Slow Acting Drugs for Osteoarthritis (SYSADOAs)-Glucosamine Sulfate, Chondroitin Sulfate, and their combination regimen in the management of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A detailed literature search was performed from 03/1994 to 31/12/2022 using various electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, using the search terms-Glucosamine sulfate (GS), Chondroitin sulfate (CS), Knee osteoarthritis, Joint pain, Joint disease, and Joint structure, for literature concerning glucosamine, chondroitin, and their combination in knee osteoarthritis treatment. Cochrane Collaboration's Risk assessment tool (version 5.4.1) was used for assessing the risk of bias and the quality of the literature. The data was extracted from the included studies and subjected to statistical analysis to determine the beneficial effect of Glucosamine Sulfate, Chondroitin Sulfate, and their combination. RESULTS: Twenty-five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this systematic review. In short, exclusively 9 RCTs for GS, 13 RCTs for CS, and 3 RCTs for the combination of GS and CS. All these studies had their treatment groups compared with placebo. In the meta-analysis, CS showed a significant reduction in pain intensity, and improved physical function compared to the placebo; GS showed a significant reduction in tibiofemoral joint space narrowing. While the combination of GS and CS showed neither a reduction in pain intensity, nor any improvement in the physical function. However, the combination exhibited a non-significant reduction in joint space narrowing. In the safety evaluation, both CS and GS have shown good safety profile and were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis revealed that the CS (with decreased pain intensity and improvement in the physical function), and GS (with significant reduction in the joint space narrowing) have significant therapeutic benefits. However, their combination did not significantly improve the symptoms or modify the disease. This may be due to the limited trials that are available on the combination of the sulfate forms of the intervention. Hence, there is a scope for conducting multicentric randomised controlled trials to evaluate and conclude the therapeutic role of CS and GS combination in the management of KOA.
目的:本研究旨在评估两种口服治疗骨关节炎的症状性慢作用药物(Symptomatic Slow Acting Drugs for Osteoarthritis,SYSADOAs)-硫酸氨基葡萄糖、硫酸软骨素及其联合方案在膝关节骨关节炎(Knee Osteoarthritis,KOA)治疗中的疗效和安全性。
方法:本系统评价按照 PRISMA 2020 指南进行。从 1994 年 3 月至 2022 年 12 月 31 日,使用各种电子数据库(包括 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 Google Scholar),使用“Glucosamine sulfate (GS)、Chondroitin sulfate (CS)、Knee osteoarthritis、Joint pain、Joint disease 和 Joint structure”等搜索词,对涉及硫酸氨基葡萄糖、硫酸软骨素及其联合治疗膝关节骨关节炎的文献进行详细的文献检索。使用 Cochrane 协作组的风险评估工具(版本 5.4.1)评估偏倚风险和文献质量。从纳入的研究中提取数据,并进行统计分析,以确定硫酸氨基葡萄糖、硫酸软骨素及其联合的有益效果。
结果:本系统评价纳入了 25 项随机对照试验(RCT)。其中,仅 9 项 RCT 研究 GS,13 项 RCT 研究 CS,3 项 RCT 研究 GS 和 CS 的联合应用。所有这些研究都将治疗组与安慰剂进行了比较。在荟萃分析中,CS 显示疼痛强度显著降低,与安慰剂相比,身体功能显著改善;GS 显示胫骨股骨关节间隙狭窄显著减少。而 GS 和 CS 的联合应用既没有减轻疼痛强度,也没有改善身体功能。然而,联合应用在关节间隙狭窄方面显示出非显著性降低。在安全性评估中,CS 和 GS 均显示出良好的安全性且耐受性良好。
结论:这项荟萃分析表明,CS(降低疼痛强度和改善身体功能)和 GS(显著减少关节间隙狭窄)具有显著的治疗益处。然而,它们的联合应用并没有显著改善症状或改变疾病进程。这可能是由于目前可用的关于联合应用干预硫酸盐形式的试验有限。因此,有必要开展多中心随机对照试验,以评估和得出 CS 和 GS 联合治疗 KOA 的治疗作用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-1-28
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-10-21
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Crit Care. 2025-3-29
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2025-3-24
EClinicalMedicine. 2020-11-26
Indian J Orthop. 2016-9