Lubis Andri M T, Siagian Carles, Wonggokusuma Erick, Marsetyo Aldo F, Setyohadi Bambang
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia - Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Acta Med Indones. 2017 Apr;49(2):105-111.
Glucosamine, chondroitinsulfate are frequently used to prevent further joint degeneration in osteoarthritis (OA). Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) is a supplement containing organic sulphur and also reported to slow anatomical joint progressivity in the knee OA. The MSM is often combined with glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate. However, there are controversies whether glucosamine-chondroitin sulfate or their combination with methylsulfonylmethane could effectively reduce pain in OA. This study is aimed to compare clinical outcome of glucosamine-chondroitin sulfate (GC), glucosamine-chondroitin sulfate-methylsulfonylmethane (GCM), and placeboin patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) Kellgren-Lawrence grade I-II.
a double blind, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 147 patients with knee OA Kellgren-Lawrence grade I-II. Patients were allocated by permuted block randomization into three groups: GC (n=49), GCM (n=50), or placebo (n=48) groups. GC group received 1500 mg of glucosamine + 1200 mg of chondroitin sulfate + 500 mg of saccharumlactis; GCM group received 1500 mg of glucosamine + 1200 mg of chondroitin sulfate + 500 mg of MSM; while placebo group received three matching capsules of saccharumlactis. The drugs were administered once daily for 3 consecutive months VAS and WOMAC scores were measured before treatment, then at 4th, 8th and 12th week after treatment.
on statistical analysis it was found that at the 12th week, there are significant difference between three treatment groups on the WOMAC score (p=0.03) and on the VAS score (p=0.004). When analyzed between weeks, GCM treatment group was found statistically significant on WOMAC score (p=0.01) and VAS score (p<0.001). Comparing the score difference between weeks, WOMAC score analysis showed significant difference between GC, GCM, and placebo in week 4 (p=0.049) and week 12 (p=0.01). In addition, VAS score also showed significant difference between groups in week 8 (p=0.006) and week 12 (p<0.001).
combination of glucosamine-chondroitinsulfate-methylsulfonylmethane showed clinical benefit for patients with knee OAK ellgren-Lawrence grade I-II compared with GC and placebo. GC did not make clinical improvement in overall groups of patients with knee OA Kellgren Lawrence grade I-II.
氨基葡萄糖、硫酸软骨素常用于预防骨关节炎(OA)中关节的进一步退变。甲基磺酰甲烷(MSM)是一种含有有机硫的补充剂,也有报道称其可减缓膝关节OA的解剖学关节进展。MSM常与氨基葡萄糖和硫酸软骨素联合使用。然而,氨基葡萄糖 - 硫酸软骨素或它们与甲基磺酰甲烷的组合是否能有效减轻OA疼痛仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较硫酸氨基葡萄糖 - 硫酸软骨素(GC)、硫酸氨基葡萄糖 - 硫酸软骨素 - 甲基磺酰甲烷(GCM)和安慰剂对凯尔格伦 - 劳伦斯I - II级膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者的临床疗效。
对147例凯尔格伦 - 劳伦斯I - II级膝关节OA患者进行了一项双盲、随机对照临床试验。患者通过置换区组随机化分为三组:GC组(n = 49)、GCM组(n = 50)或安慰剂组(n = 48)。GC组接受1500毫克氨基葡萄糖 + 1200毫克硫酸软骨素 + 500毫克乳糖;GCM组接受1500毫克氨基葡萄糖 + 1200毫克硫酸软骨素 + 500毫克MSM;而安慰剂组接受三粒匹配的乳糖胶囊。药物每日服用一次,连续服用3个月。在治疗前、治疗后第4、8和12周测量视觉模拟评分(VAS)和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分。
统计分析发现,在第12周时,三个治疗组在WOMAC评分(p = 0.03)和VAS评分(p = 0.004)上存在显著差异。在各周之间进行分析时,发现GCM治疗组在WOMAC评分(p = 0.01)和VAS评分(p < 0.001)上具有统计学意义。比较各周之间的评分差异,WOMAC评分分析显示GC、GCM和安慰剂在第4周(p = 0.049)和第12周(p = 0.01)存在显著差异。此外,VAS评分在第8周(p = 0.006)和第12周(p < 0.001)时组间也显示出显著差异。
与GC和安慰剂相比,硫酸氨基葡萄糖 - 硫酸软骨素 - 甲基磺酰甲烷组合对凯尔格伦 - 劳伦斯I - II级膝关节OA患者显示出临床益处。GC在凯尔格伦 - 劳伦斯I - II级膝关节OA患者的总体组中未产生临床改善。