Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Environ Res. 2024 Jul 1;252(Pt 2):118828. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118828. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
Increasing evidence links early life residential exposure to natural urban environmental attributes and positive health outcomes in children. However, few studies have focused on their protective effects on the risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of neighborhood greenspace, and active living environments during pregnancy with ASD in young children (≤6 years).
We conducted a population-based matched case-control study of singleton term births in Ontario, Canada for 2012-2016. The ASD and environmental data was generated using the Ontario Autism Spectrum Profile, the Better Outcomes Registry & Network Ontario, and Canadian Urban Environmental Health Research Consortium. We employed conditional logistic regressions to estimate the odds ratio (OR) between ASD and environmental factors characterizing selected greenspace metrics and neighborhoods conducive to active living (i.e., green view index (GVI), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), tree canopy, park proximity and active living environments index (ALE)).
We linked 8643 mother-child pairs, including 1554 cases (18%). NDVI (OR 1.034, 0.944-1.024, per Inter Quartile Range [IQR] = 0.08), GVI (OR 1.025, 95% CI 0.953-1.087, per IQR = 9.45%), tree canopy (OR 0.992, 95% CI 0.903-1.089, per IQR = 6.24%) and the different categories of ALE were not associated with ASD in adjusted models for air pollution. In contrast, living closer to a park was protective (OR 0.888, 0.833-0.948, per 0.06 increase in park proximity index), when adjusted for air pollution.
This study reported mixed findings showing both null and beneficial effects of green spaces and active living environments on ASD. Further investigations are warranted to elucidate the role of exposure to greenspaces and active living environments on the development of ASD.
越来越多的证据表明,儿童在生命早期接触自然城市环境属性与积极的健康结果之间存在关联。然而,很少有研究关注它们对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)风险的保护作用。本研究旨在调查孕期邻里绿地和积极生活环境与幼儿(≤6 岁)ASD 的关系。
我们在加拿大安大略省进行了一项基于人群的匹配病例对照研究,研究对象为 2012-2016 年期间的单胎足月出生儿。ASD 和环境数据来自安大略自闭症谱系特征量表、更好的结果登记和网络安大略省、以及加拿大城市环境健康研究联盟。我们采用条件逻辑回归估计 ASD 与选定绿地指标和有利于积极生活的邻里环境特征(即绿色景观指数(GVI)、归一化差异植被指数(NDVI)、树冠、公园临近度和积极生活环境指数(ALE))之间的比值比(OR)。
我们共链接了 8643 对母婴对,包括 1554 例病例(18%)。NDVI(OR 1.034,95%CI 1.024-1.044,每增加 0.08 个四分位距 [IQR])、GVI(OR 1.025,95%CI 0.953-1.087,每增加 9.45 个 IQR)、树冠(OR 0.992,95%CI 0.903-1.089,每增加 6.24% IQR)和不同 ALE 类别与调整后的空气污染模型中的 ASD 无关。相比之下,当调整空气污染因素时,靠近公园居住具有保护作用(OR 0.888,95%CI 0.833-0.948,每增加 0.06 个公园临近度指数)。
本研究报告了一些相互矛盾的发现,表明绿地和积极生活环境对 ASD 既有负面影响,也有有益影响。需要进一步的研究来阐明接触绿地和积极生活环境对 ASD 发展的作用。