Younan Diana, Tuvblad Catherine, Li Lianfa, Wu Jun, Lurmann Fred, Franklin Meredith, Berhane Kiros, McConnell Rob, Wu Anna H, Baker Laura A, Chen Jiu-Chiuan
Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
University of Southern California Dornsife College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences, Los Angeles; School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Jul;55(7):591-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 12.
Neighborhood greenspace improves mental health of urban-dwelling populations, but its putative neurobehavioral benefits in adolescents remain unclear. We conducted a prospective study on urban-dwelling adolescents to examine the association between greenspace in residential neighborhood and aggressive behaviors.
Participants (n = 1,287) of the Risk Factors for Antisocial Behavior Study, a multi-ethnic cohort of twins and triplets born in 1990 to 1995 and living in Southern California, were examined in 2000 to 2012 (aged 9-18 years) with repeated assessments of their aggressive behaviors by the parent-reported Child Behavior Checklist. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) derived from satellite imagery was used as a proxy for residential neighborhood greenspace aggregated over various spatiotemporal scales before each assessment. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to estimate the effects of greenspace on aggressive behaviors, adjusting for within-family/within-individual correlations and other potential confounders.
Both short-term (1- to 6-month) and long-term (1- to 3-year) exposures to greenspace within 1,000 meters surrounding residences were associated with reduced aggressive behaviors. The benefit of increasing vegetation over the range (∼0.12 in NDVI) commonly seen in urban environments was equivalent to approximately 2 to 2.5 years of behavioral maturation. Sociodemographic factors (e.g., age, gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status) and neighborhood quality did not confound or modify these associations, and the benefits remained after accounting for temperature.
Our novel findings support the benefits of neighborhood greenspace in reducing aggressive behaviors of urban-dwelling adolescents. Community-based interventions are needed to determine the efficacy of greenspace as a preemptive strategy to reduce aggressive behaviors in urban environments.
社区绿地可改善城市居民的心理健康,但其对青少年潜在的神经行为益处仍不明确。我们对城市青少年进行了一项前瞻性研究,以探讨居住社区绿地与攻击性行为之间的关联。
反社会行为风险因素研究的参与者(n = 1287),这是一个多民族的双胞胎和三胞胎队列,于1990年至1995年出生并居住在南加州,在2000年至2012年期间(9至18岁)接受检查,通过家长报告的儿童行为清单对其攻击性行为进行重复评估。利用卫星图像得出的归一化植被指数(NDVI)作为每次评估前在不同时空尺度上汇总的居住社区绿地的替代指标。采用多水平混合效应模型来估计绿地对攻击性行为的影响,并对家庭内部/个体内部相关性及其他潜在混杂因素进行校正。
居住周边1000米范围内的绿地短期(1至6个月)和长期(1至3年)暴露均与攻击性行为减少有关。在城市环境中常见的植被增加幅度(NDVI约为0.12)所带来的益处相当于行为成熟约2至2.5年。社会人口学因素(如年龄、性别、种族/民族和社会经济地位)及社区质量并未混淆或改变这些关联,且在考虑温度因素后这些益处依然存在。
我们的新发现支持社区绿地对减少城市青少年攻击性行为有益。需要开展基于社区的干预措施,以确定绿地作为减少城市环境中攻击性行为的预防策略的有效性。