Manaf Zahara Abdul, Rosli Mohd Hafiz Mohd, Noor Norhayati Mohd, Jamil Nor Aini, Mazri Fatin Hanani, Shahar Suzana
Dietetic Program and Centre for Healthy Ageing and Wellness, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 50300 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Dietetics Unit, Kapar Health Clinic, Ministry of Health, 42200 Klang, Malaysia.
Nutr Res Pract. 2024 Apr;18(2):294-307. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2024.18.2.294. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Dietitians frequently use nutrition education tools to facilitate dietary counselling sessions. Nevertheless, these tools may require adaptation to keep pace with technological advancements. This study had a 2-fold purpose: first, to identify the types of nutrition education tools currently in use, identify their limitations, and explore dietitians' perspectives on the importance of these tools; second, to investigate the features that dietitians prefer in digital nutrition education tools.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: A semi-structured face-to-face interview was conducted among 15 dietitians from selected public hospitals, primary care clinics, and teaching hospitals in Malaysia. Inductive thematic analysis of the responses was conducted using NVivo version 12 software.
Most dietitians used physical education tools including the healthy plate model, pamphlets, food models, and flip charts. These tools were perceived as important as they facilitate the nutrition assessment process, deliver nutrition intervention, and are time efficient. However, dietitians described the current educational tools as impersonal, outdated, limited in availability due to financial constraints, unhandy, and difficult to visualise. Alternatively, they strongly favoured digital education tools that provided instant feedback, utilised an automated system, included a local food database, were user-friendly, developed by experts in the field, and seamlessly integrated into the healthcare system.
Presently, although dietitians have a preference for digital educational tools, they heavily rely on physical nutrition education tools due to their availability despite the perception that these tools are outdated, impersonal, and inconvenient. Transitioning to digital dietary education tools could potentially address these issues.
背景/目的:营养师经常使用营养教育工具来推动饮食咨询环节。然而,这些工具可能需要与时俱进以跟上技术进步。本研究有两个目的:第一,确定当前使用的营养教育工具的类型,找出其局限性,并探讨营养师对这些工具重要性的看法;第二,调查营养师对数字营养教育工具的偏好特征。
对象/方法:对马来西亚选定的公立医院、基层医疗诊所和教学医院的15名营养师进行了半结构化面对面访谈。使用NVivo 12软件对回复进行归纳主题分析。
大多数营养师使用实体教育工具,包括健康餐盘模型、宣传册、食物模型和活动挂图。这些工具被认为很重要,因为它们有助于营养评估过程、提供营养干预且效率高。然而,营养师称当前的教育工具缺乏人情味、过时、因资金限制获取有限、不方便且难以直观呈现。相反,他们强烈青睐能提供即时反馈、使用自动化系统、包含本地食物数据库、用户友好、由该领域专家开发并能无缝融入医疗系统的数字教育工具。
目前,尽管营养师偏爱数字教育工具,但由于实体营养教育工具随手可得,他们仍严重依赖这些工具,尽管认为这些工具过时、缺乏人情味且不方便。向数字饮食教育工具过渡可能会解决这些问题。