• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨质疏松症患者接受两年地诺单抗治疗无反应的危险因素:一项回顾性单中心队列研究。

Risk factors for nonresponse to 2 years of denosumab administration in patients with osteoporosis: A retrospective single-center cohorts study.

作者信息

Yamamoto Akiko, Nagao Masashi, Nishizaki Yuji, Maeda Eri, Ishijima Muneaki

机构信息

Clinical Translational Science Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.

Medical Technology Innovation Center Juntendo University Tokyo Japan.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 4;7(4):e1993. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1993. eCollection 2024 Apr.

DOI:10.1002/hsr2.1993
PMID:38585014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10995440/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To investigate the factors associated with changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and the incidence of fractures in osteoporotic patients treated with denosumab.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 162 osteoporotic patients treated with denosumab for 24 months between 2013 and 2019. Patients were divided according to the changes in BMD as nonresponders (N group: <3% increase in lumbar spine BMD [LBMD], N group: <0% increase in femoral neck BMD [FNBMD]) or responders (R group: ≥3% increase in LBMD, R group: ≥0% increase in FNBMD).

RESULTS

The respective changes in the LBMD and FNBMD after 24 months of denosumab treatment were 9.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1-10.6) and 3.3% (95% CI: 2.1-4.5). Twenty-eight (17.3%) patients were in the N group, and 134 (82.7%) were in the R group. A history of bisphosphonate treatment was a risk factor for being in the N group (odds ratio [OR]: 3.84, 95% CI: 1.38-10.71,  = 0.007; adjusted OR: 3.21, 95% CI: 1.01-10.19,  = 0.048). Although the N ( = 48; 30.8%) and R ( = 108; 69.2%) groups had similar baseline characteristics, the N group had a significantly higher baseline FNBMD than the R group ( = 0.003). The change in FNBMD was negatively associated with the FNBMD at baseline ( = -0.34,  < 0.001). No new osteoporotic fractures occurred in either group during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In osteoporotic patients receiving denosumab treatment, a history of bisphosphonate treatment was a risk factor for a lack of increase in LBMD, and a higher FNBMD at baseline was negatively associated with the change in FNBMD.

摘要

背景与目的

研究地诺单抗治疗骨质疏松症患者时,与骨密度(BMD)变化及骨折发生率相关的因素。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2013年至2019年间接受地诺单抗治疗24个月的162例骨质疏松症患者。根据BMD变化将患者分为无反应者(N组:腰椎骨密度[LBMD]增加<3%,股骨颈骨密度[FNBMD]增加<0%)或反应者(R组:LBMD增加≥3%,FNBMD增加≥0%)。

结果

地诺单抗治疗24个月后,LBMD和FNBMD各自的变化分别为9.3%(95%置信区间[CI]:8.1 - 10.6)和3.3%(95%CI:2.1 - 4.5)。28例(17.3%)患者属于N组,134例(82.7%)属于R组。双膦酸盐治疗史是N组的一个危险因素(比值比[OR]:3.84,95%CI:1.38 - 10.71,P = 0.007;校正OR:3.21,95%CI:1.01 - 10.19,P = 0.048)。尽管N组(n = 48;30.8%)和R组(n = 108;69.2%)具有相似的基线特征,但N组的基线FNBMD显著高于R组(P = 0.003)。FNBMD的变化与基线时的FNBMD呈负相关(P = -0.34,P < 0.001)。随访期间两组均未发生新的骨质疏松性骨折。

结论

在接受地诺单抗治疗的骨质疏松症患者中,双膦酸盐治疗史是LBMD缺乏增加的危险因素,基线时较高的FNBMD与FNBMD的变化呈负相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d43/10995440/b98d1fc854da/HSR2-7-e1993-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d43/10995440/b98d1fc854da/HSR2-7-e1993-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d43/10995440/b98d1fc854da/HSR2-7-e1993-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors for nonresponse to 2 years of denosumab administration in patients with osteoporosis: A retrospective single-center cohorts study.骨质疏松症患者接受两年地诺单抗治疗无反应的危险因素:一项回顾性单中心队列研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 4;7(4):e1993. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1993. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Treatment for osteoporosis in people with beta-thalassaemia.β-地中海贫血患者骨质疏松的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 9;5(5):CD010429. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010429.pub3.
3
Effects of Denosumab on Bone Metabolic Markers and Bone Mineral Density in Patients Treated with Glucocorticoids.地诺单抗对接受糖皮质激素治疗患者骨代谢标志物及骨密度的影响。
Intern Med. 2017;56(6):631-636. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.56.7797. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
4
A retrospective analysis of nonresponse to denosumab after hip fractures.髋部骨折后地舒单抗无应答的回顾性分析。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2023 Mar;89(1):71-76. doi: 10.52628/89.1.9808.
5
Effects of denosumab versus teriparatide in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis patients with prior bisphosphonate treatment.地诺单抗与特立帕肽对曾接受双膦酸盐治疗的糖皮质激素性骨质疏松症患者的疗效比较
Bone Rep. 2020 Jul 4;13:100293. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100293. eCollection 2020 Dec.
6
Significant improvement of bone mineral density and bone turnover markers by denosumab therapy in bisphosphonate-unresponsive patients.地舒单抗治疗可显著改善对双膦酸盐无应答患者的骨密度和骨转换标志物。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Feb;28(2):559-566. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3764-7. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
7
Denosumab significantly improves bone mineral density with or without bisphosphonate pre-treatment in osteoporosis with rheumatoid arthritis : Denosumab improves bone mineral density in osteoporosis with rheumatoid arthritis.在类风湿关节炎相关性骨质疏松症中,无论是否进行双膦酸盐预处理,地诺单抗均可显著提高骨密度:地诺单抗可提高类风湿关节炎相关性骨质疏松症的骨密度。
Arch Osteoporos. 2017 Sep 21;12(1):80. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0371-y.
8
Comparison of the clinical effectiveness and safety between the use of denosumab vs bisphosphonates in renal transplant patients.比较地舒单抗与双磷酸盐类药物在肾移植患者中的临床疗效和安全性。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 May;31(5):973-980. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05267-1. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
9
Pharmacological interventions versus placebo, no treatment or usual care for osteoporosis in people with chronic kidney disease stages 3-5D.药物干预与安慰剂、无治疗或常规护理相比,用于慢性肾脏病 3-5D 期患者的骨质疏松症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 7;7(7):CD013424. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013424.pub2.
10
Romosozumab followed by denosumab versus denosumab only: a post hoc analysis of FRAME and FRAME extension.罗莫佐单抗序贯地舒单抗对比单纯地舒单抗:FRAME 和 FRAME 扩展研究的事后分析。
J Bone Miner Res. 2024 Sep 2;39(9):1268-1277. doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae116.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors for poor response to denosumab treatment in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.日本绝经后骨质疏松症女性对狄诺塞麦治疗反应不佳的风险因素。
J Bone Miner Metab. 2022 Nov;40(6):960-967. doi: 10.1007/s00774-022-01357-z. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
2
Denosumab-induced hypocalcemia in patients with osteoporosis: can you know who will get low?地舒单抗致骨质疏松症患者低钙血症:能否预知谁会发生低钙血症?
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Apr;31(4):655-665. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05261-7. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
3
Osteoporosis.骨质疏松症。
Lancet. 2019 Jan 26;393(10169):364-376. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32112-3.
4
Efficacy of 4-year denosumab treatment alone or in combination with teriparatide in Japanese postmenopausal osteoporotic women.在日本绝经后骨质疏松症女性中,单独使用地诺单抗治疗4年或地诺单抗与特立帕肽联合使用4年的疗效。
Mod Rheumatol. 2019 Jul;29(4):676-681. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2018.1524997. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
5
The impact of switching once-weekly teriparatide to denosumab in osteoporosis patients.骨质疏松症患者从每周一次的特立帕肽转换为地诺单抗的影响。
J Orthop Sci. 2019 Jan;24(1):153-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
6
Variability of Denosumab densitometric response in postmenopausal osteoporosis.绝经后骨质疏松症中地舒单抗骨密度反应的可变性。
Rheumatol Int. 2018 Mar;38(3):461-466. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-3929-0. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
7
Osteoporosis treatment: recent developments and ongoing challenges.骨质疏松症治疗:最新进展和持续挑战。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Nov;5(11):898-907. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30188-2. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
8
Comparison of the effects of denosumab between a native vitamin D combination and an active vitamin D combination in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.地诺单抗在天然维生素D联合用药与活性维生素D联合用药治疗绝经后骨质疏松症患者中的效果比较。
J Bone Miner Metab. 2017 Sep;35(5):571-580. doi: 10.1007/s00774-016-0792-5. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
9
Significant improvement of bone mineral density and bone turnover markers by denosumab therapy in bisphosphonate-unresponsive patients.地舒单抗治疗可显著改善对双膦酸盐无应答患者的骨密度和骨转换标志物。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Feb;28(2):559-566. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3764-7. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
10
A retrospective analysis of nonresponse to daily teriparatide treatment.对每日一次特立帕肽治疗无反应的回顾性分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Sep;27(9):2845-2853. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3581-z. Epub 2016 Apr 7.