ChatGPT在期刊评估中的诊断不可靠性。
Diagnosis Unreliability of ChatGPT for Journal Evaluation.
作者信息
Dadkhah Mehdi, Oermann Marilyn H, Hegedüs Mihály, Raman Raghu, Dávid Lóránt Dénes
机构信息
Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri, Kerala, India.
Technology Forecasting Department, SnowaTec Technology Center and Innovation Factory, Entekhab Industrial Group, Isfahan, Iran.
出版信息
Adv Pharm Bull. 2024 Mar;14(1):1-4. doi: 10.34172/apb.2024.020. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
PURPOSE
Academic and other researchers have limited tools with which to address the current proliferation of predatory and hijacked journals. These journals can have negative effects on science, research funding, and the dissemination of information. As most predatory and hijacked journals are not error free, this study used ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) technology tool, to conduct an evaluation of journal quality.
METHODS
Predatory and hijacked journals were analyzed for reliability using ChatGPT, and the reliability of result have been discussed.
RESULTS
It shows that ChatGPT is an unreliable tool for journal quality evaluation for both hijacked and predatory journals.
CONCLUSION
To show how to address this gap, an early trial version of Journal Checker Chatbot has been developed and is discussed as an alternative chatbot that can assist researchers in detecting hijacked journals.
目的
学术研究人员及其他研究人员在应对当前掠夺性期刊和被劫持期刊泛滥的问题时，可用的工具有限。这些期刊可能会对科学、研究资金以及信息传播产生负面影响。由于大多数掠夺性期刊和被劫持期刊并非没有错误，本研究使用人工智能（AI）技术工具ChatGPT对期刊质量进行评估。
方法
使用ChatGPT分析掠夺性期刊和被劫持期刊的可靠性，并对结果的可靠性进行了讨论。
结果
结果表明，ChatGPT对于被劫持期刊和掠夺性期刊的质量评估而言是不可靠的工具。
结论
为了说明如何弥补这一差距，已开发了期刊检查聊天机器人的早期试用版本，并将其作为一种可协助研究人员检测被劫持期刊的替代聊天机器人进行了讨论。
Zotero 插件