Suppr超能文献

医学专业学生在综合课程中的学习风格偏好与学业成绩。

Learning style preference and the academic achievements of medical students in an integrated curriculum.

机构信息

Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Med Life. 2023 Dec;16(12):1802-1807. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0366.

Abstract

Understanding how individuals learn best, known as learning style, is integral to optimizing educational outcomes. This analytical study was conducted among students in their fourth year who finalized their problem-based activities at the College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Saudi Arabia. The visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic (VARK) model was adopted to assess individual differences in learning preferences and their correlation with academic achievement in the problem-based learning (PBL)-dependent curriculum. The online self-administered survey was completed by 64 students with a response rate of 79%. Of these, 63.5% were men and 36.5% were women, with a mean age of 21.9 years and a grade point average (GPA) of 3.83. Analysis of learning style distribution revealed that 34.9% preferred visual, 54% preferred auditory, 17.5% preferred read/write, and 90.5% preferred kinesthetic styles. Also, combined learning modalities revealed that 14.3% preferred unimodal, 74.6% bimodal, and 11.1% trimodal approaches. The most frequent unimodal approach was kinesthetic, while auditory/kinesthetic and visual/auditory/kinesthetic were the predominant bimodal and trimodal preferences. No significant differences in GPA were found among students with different selective learning styles or combined learning modalities, as determined by one-way ANOVA and chi-square tests. Spearman's rho correlation revealed a positive correlation between the learning modality and the auditory style ( < 0.001). Also, a negative correlation was identified between reading/writing versus kinesthetic and auditory versus visual learning styles ( = 0.001). However, no significant correlations were identified between grades or GPA and specific learning styles. It can be concluded that the integrated PBL-dependent curriculum adopted at the College of Medicine, University of Bisha, is a suitable teaching modality satisfying different learning styles, but continuous monitoring is crucial.

摘要

了解个体的最佳学习方式,即学习风格,对于优化教育成果至关重要。本分析性研究在沙特阿拉伯比沙大学医学院完成,对象为四年级学生,他们完成了基于问题的活动。采用视觉、听觉、读写和动觉(VARK)模型评估学习偏好的个体差异及其与基于问题的学习(PBL)课程中的学业成绩的相关性。通过在线自我管理调查,对 64 名学生进行了调查,回应率为 79%。其中,63.5%为男性,36.5%为女性,平均年龄为 21.9 岁,平均绩点(GPA)为 3.83。学习风格分布分析显示,34.9%的学生喜欢视觉,54%的学生喜欢听觉,17.5%的学生喜欢读写,90.5%的学生喜欢动觉。此外,综合学习模式显示,14.3%的学生喜欢单一模式,74.6%的学生喜欢双重模式,11.1%的学生喜欢三重模式。最常见的单一模式是动觉,而听觉/动觉和视觉/听觉/动觉是主要的双重和三重模式偏好。通过单因素方差分析和卡方检验,发现不同选择性学习风格或综合学习模式的学生在 GPA 方面没有显著差异。Spearman rho 相关性显示,学习模式与听觉模式之间存在正相关( < 0.001)。此外,还发现阅读/写作与动觉和听觉与视觉学习风格之间存在负相关( = 0.001)。然而,特定学习风格与成绩或 GPA 之间没有显著相关性。综上所述,比沙大学医学院采用的综合 PBL 课程是一种满足不同学习风格的合适教学模式,但需要持续监测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf37/10994608/1d1a44d786ef/JMedLife-16-1802-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验