Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha, Saudi Arabia.
J Med Life. 2023 Dec;16(12):1802-1807. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0366.
Understanding how individuals learn best, known as learning style, is integral to optimizing educational outcomes. This analytical study was conducted among students in their fourth year who finalized their problem-based activities at the College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Saudi Arabia. The visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic (VARK) model was adopted to assess individual differences in learning preferences and their correlation with academic achievement in the problem-based learning (PBL)-dependent curriculum. The online self-administered survey was completed by 64 students with a response rate of 79%. Of these, 63.5% were men and 36.5% were women, with a mean age of 21.9 years and a grade point average (GPA) of 3.83. Analysis of learning style distribution revealed that 34.9% preferred visual, 54% preferred auditory, 17.5% preferred read/write, and 90.5% preferred kinesthetic styles. Also, combined learning modalities revealed that 14.3% preferred unimodal, 74.6% bimodal, and 11.1% trimodal approaches. The most frequent unimodal approach was kinesthetic, while auditory/kinesthetic and visual/auditory/kinesthetic were the predominant bimodal and trimodal preferences. No significant differences in GPA were found among students with different selective learning styles or combined learning modalities, as determined by one-way ANOVA and chi-square tests. Spearman's rho correlation revealed a positive correlation between the learning modality and the auditory style ( < 0.001). Also, a negative correlation was identified between reading/writing versus kinesthetic and auditory versus visual learning styles ( = 0.001). However, no significant correlations were identified between grades or GPA and specific learning styles. It can be concluded that the integrated PBL-dependent curriculum adopted at the College of Medicine, University of Bisha, is a suitable teaching modality satisfying different learning styles, but continuous monitoring is crucial.
了解个体的最佳学习方式,即学习风格,对于优化教育成果至关重要。本分析性研究在沙特阿拉伯比沙大学医学院完成,对象为四年级学生,他们完成了基于问题的活动。采用视觉、听觉、读写和动觉(VARK)模型评估学习偏好的个体差异及其与基于问题的学习(PBL)课程中的学业成绩的相关性。通过在线自我管理调查,对 64 名学生进行了调查,回应率为 79%。其中,63.5%为男性,36.5%为女性,平均年龄为 21.9 岁,平均绩点(GPA)为 3.83。学习风格分布分析显示,34.9%的学生喜欢视觉,54%的学生喜欢听觉,17.5%的学生喜欢读写,90.5%的学生喜欢动觉。此外,综合学习模式显示,14.3%的学生喜欢单一模式,74.6%的学生喜欢双重模式,11.1%的学生喜欢三重模式。最常见的单一模式是动觉,而听觉/动觉和视觉/听觉/动觉是主要的双重和三重模式偏好。通过单因素方差分析和卡方检验,发现不同选择性学习风格或综合学习模式的学生在 GPA 方面没有显著差异。Spearman rho 相关性显示,学习模式与听觉模式之间存在正相关( < 0.001)。此外,还发现阅读/写作与动觉和听觉与视觉学习风格之间存在负相关( = 0.001)。然而,特定学习风格与成绩或 GPA 之间没有显著相关性。综上所述,比沙大学医学院采用的综合 PBL 课程是一种满足不同学习风格的合适教学模式,但需要持续监测。