Jayasinghe Krishani, Chamika W A S, Jayaweera Kaushalya, Abhayasinghe Kalpani, Dissanayake Lasith, Sumathipala Athula, Ives Jonathan
Institute for Research and Development in Health & Social Care, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka.
Centre for Ethics in Medicine, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2023 Nov 29;16(2):281-302. doi: 10.1007/s41649-023-00269-y. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Engagement with genomic medicine and research has increased globally during the past few decades, including rapid developments in Sri Lanka. Genomic research is carried out in Sri Lanka on a variety of scales and with different aims and perspectives. However, there are concerns about participants' understanding of genomic research, including the validity of informed consent. This article reports a qualitative study aiming to explore the understanding, knowledge, and attitudes of the Sri Lankan public towards genomic medicine and to inform the development of an effective and appropriate process for informed consent in that setting. Purposive sampling was employed. Participants were recruited from a sub-group of the public in Colombo, Sri Lanka who had either consented or refused to donate genetic material for a biobank. Data were collected using face-to-face semi-structured interviews. Interview data were transcribed verbatim and translated into English. Conventional content analysis was used. The analysis developed three key themes: a) 'Scientific literacy' describes an apparent lack of scientific knowledge that seems to affect a participant's ability to understand the research, b) 'Motivation' describes narratives about why participants chose (not) to take part in the research, despite not understanding it, and c) 'Trust' describes how trust served to mitigate the apparent ethical deficit created by not being fully informed. In this article, we argue that informed trust is likely an acceptable basis for consent, particularly in settings where scientific literacy might be low. However, researchers must work to be worthy of that trust and ensure that misconceptions are actively addressed.
在过去几十年里,全球范围内对基因组医学和研究的参与度有所提高,斯里兰卡也有快速发展。斯里兰卡开展了各种规模、具有不同目标和视角的基因组研究。然而,人们担心参与者对基因组研究的理解,包括知情同意的有效性。本文报告了一项定性研究,旨在探索斯里兰卡公众对基因组医学的理解、知识和态度,并为在该背景下制定有效且合适的知情同意程序提供信息。采用了目的抽样法。参与者从斯里兰卡科伦坡的一个公众子群体中招募,他们要么同意要么拒绝为生物样本库捐赠遗传物质。通过面对面的半结构化访谈收集数据。访谈数据逐字转录并翻译成英文。使用了常规内容分析法。分析得出了三个关键主题:a)“科学素养”描述了明显缺乏科学知识,这似乎影响了参与者理解研究的能力;b)“动机”描述了尽管不理解,但参与者选择(或不选择)参与研究的原因;c)“信任”描述了信任如何减轻因未充分知情而产生的明显伦理缺陷。在本文中,我们认为知情信任可能是同意的可接受基础,特别是在科学素养可能较低的背景下。然而,研究人员必须努力值得这种信任,并确保积极解决误解。