Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, GA (D.E.K.).
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY), New York (M.A.W.).
Circulation. 2024 Jun 11;149(24):1875-1884. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069291. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
Renal denervation (RDN) has demonstrated clinically relevant reductions in blood pressure (BP) among individuals with uncontrolled hypertension despite lifestyle intervention and medications. The safety and effectiveness of alcohol-mediated RDN have not been formally studied in this indication.
TARGET BP I is a prospective, international, sham-controlled, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded trial investigating the safety and efficacy of alcohol-mediated RDN. Patients with office systolic BP (SBP) ≥150 and ≤180 mm Hg, office diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg, and mean 24-hour ambulatory SBP ≥135 and ≤170 mm Hg despite prescription of 2 to 5 antihypertensive medications were enrolled. The primary end point was the baseline-adjusted change in mean 24-hour ambulatory SBP 3 months after the procedure. Secondary end points included mean between-group differences in office and ambulatory BP at additional time points.
Among 301 patients randomized 1:1 to RDN or sham control, RDN was associated with a significant reduction in 24-hour ambulatory SBP at 3 months (mean±SD, -10.0±14.2 mm Hg versus -6.8±12.1 mm Hg; treatment difference, -3.2 mm Hg [95% CI, -6.3 to 0.0]; =0.0487). Subgroup analysis of the primary end point revealed no significant interaction across predefined subgroups. At 3 months, the mean change in office SBP was -12.7±18.3 and -9.7±17.3 mm Hg (difference, -3.0 [95% CI, -7.0 to 1.0]; =0.173) for RDN and sham, respectively. No significant differences in ambulatory or office diastolic BP were observed. Adverse safety events through 6 months were uncommon, with one instance of accessory renal artery dissection in the RDN group (0.7%). No significant between-group differences in medication changes or patient adherence were identified.
Alcohol-mediated RDN was associated with a modest but statistically significant reduction in 24-hour ambulatory SBP compared with sham control. No significant differences between groups in office BP or 6-month major adverse events were observed.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02910414.
尽管进行了生活方式干预和药物治疗,肾去神经术(RDN)仍可使血压(BP)控制不佳的个体血压显著降低。酒精介导的 RDN 在该适应证中的安全性和有效性尚未经过正式研究。
TARGET BP I 是一项前瞻性、国际、假对照、随机、患者和评估者设盲试验,旨在研究酒精介导的 RDN 的安全性和疗效。纳入了办公室收缩压(SBP)≥150mmHg 且≤180mmHg、办公室舒张压≥90mmHg、平均 24 小时动态 SBP≥135mmHg 且≤170mmHg,且接受 2 至 5 种降压药物治疗的患者。主要终点是术后 3 个月时平均 24 小时动态 SBP 的基线调整变化。次要终点包括在其他时间点诊室和动态 BP 的组间平均差异。
在随机分为 RDN 组和假对照组的 301 例患者中,RDN 与 3 个月时 24 小时动态 SBP 显著降低相关(平均±SD,-10.0±14.2mmHg 比-6.8±12.1mmHg;治疗差异,-3.2mmHg [95%CI,-6.3 至 0.0];=0.0487)。主要终点的亚组分析显示,在预定亚组中无显著交互作用。3 个月时,RDN 组和假对照组的办公室 SBP 平均变化分别为-12.7±18.3mmHg 和-9.7±17.3mmHg(差异,-3.0 [95%CI,-7.0 至 1.0];=0.173)。未观察到动态或办公室舒张压的显著差异。6 个月时不良安全事件少见,RDN 组发生 1 例副肾动脉夹层(0.7%)。未发现组间药物变化或患者依从性的显著差异。
与假对照相比,酒精介导的 RDN 可使 24 小时动态 SBP 适度降低,但具有统计学意义。未观察到两组在诊室 BP 或 6 个月时主要不良事件方面的显著差异。