Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine University of Kentucky Bowling Green KY.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School Boston MA.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e034910. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034910. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
Despite optimal medical therapy, a significant proportion of patients' blood pressure remains uncontrolled. Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) has been proposed as a potential intervention for uncontrolled hypertension. We conducted an updated meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of RDN in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, with emphasis on the differential effect of RDN in patients on and off antihypertensive medications.
Online databases were searched to identify randomized clinical trials comparing efficacy and safety of RDN versus control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Subgroup analyses were conducted for sham-controlled trials and studies that used RDN devices that have gained or are currently seeking US Food and Drug Administration approval. Fifteen trials with 2581 patients (RDN, 1723; sham, 858) were included. In patients off antihypertensive medications undergoing RDN, a significant reduction in 24-hour ambulatory (-3.70 [95% CI, -5.41 to -2.00] mm Hg), office (-4.76 [95% CI, -7.57 to -1.94] mm Hg), and home (-3.28 [95% CI, -5.96 to -0.61] mm Hg) systolic blood pressures was noted. In patients on antihypertensive medications, a significant reduction was observed in 24-hour ambulatory (-2.23 [95% CI, -3.56 to -0.90] mm Hg), office (-6.39 [95% CI, -11.49 to -1.30]), home (-6.08 [95% CI, -11.54 to -0.61] mm Hg), daytime (-2.62 [95% CI, -4.14 to -1.11]), and nighttime (-2.70 [95% CI, -5.13 to -0.27]) systolic blood pressures, as well as 24-hour ambulatory (-1.16 [95% CI, -1.96 to -0.35]), office (-3.17 [95% CI, -5.54 to -0.80]), and daytime (-1.47 [95% CI, -2.50 to -0.27]) diastolic blood pressures.
RDN significantly lowers blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, in patients off and on antihypertensive medications, with a favorable safety profile. The efficacy of RDN was consistent in sham-controlled trials and contemporary trials using US Food and Drug Administration-approved devices.
尽管采用了最佳的药物治疗,仍有相当一部分患者的血压得不到控制。基于导管的肾脏去神经术(RDN)已被提出作为治疗未控制高血压的一种潜在干预手段。我们进行了一项更新的荟萃分析,以评估 RDN 在未控制高血压患者中的疗效和安全性,重点关注 RDN 在接受和不接受降压药物治疗的患者中的差异效果。
在线数据库中检索了比较 RDN 与对照治疗未控制高血压患者的疗效和安全性的随机临床试验。对假手术对照试验和使用已获得或正在寻求美国食品和药物管理局批准的 RDN 设备的研究进行了亚组分析。共纳入 15 项试验,共 2581 例患者(RDN 组 1723 例,假手术组 858 例)。在未接受降压药物治疗的 RDN 患者中,24 小时动态血压(-3.70 [95%置信区间,-5.41 至-2.00] mmHg)、诊室血压(-4.76 [95%置信区间,-7.57 至-1.94] mmHg)和家庭血压(-3.28 [95%置信区间,-5.96 至-0.61] mmHg)显著降低。在接受降压药物治疗的患者中,24 小时动态血压(-2.23 [95%置信区间,-3.56 至-0.90] mmHg)、诊室血压(-6.39 [95%置信区间,-11.49 至-1.30])、家庭血压(-6.08 [95%置信区间,-11.54 至-0.61] mmHg)、日间血压(-2.62 [95%置信区间,-4.14 至-1.11] mmHg)和夜间血压(-2.70 [95%置信区间,-5.13 至-0.27] mmHg)以及 24 小时动态血压(-1.16 [95%置信区间,-1.96 至-0.35])、诊室血压(-3.17 [95%置信区间,-5.54 至-0.80])和日间血压(-1.47 [95%置信区间,-2.50 至-0.27])mmHg 也显著降低。
RDN 可显著降低未控制高血压患者的血压,无论患者是否接受降压药物治疗,且安全性良好。RDN 的疗效在假手术对照试验和使用美国食品和药物管理局批准设备的当代试验中是一致的。