Division of Hematology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Oyaguchi Kami-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
Department of Hematology, Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Int J Hematol. 2024 Jul;120(1):60-70. doi: 10.1007/s12185-024-03758-4. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
This study investigated changes in treatment modalities and outcomes of chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CP-CML) after the approval of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (2G-TKIs) for first-line therapy. Patients were grouped into those who underwent TKI therapy up to December 2010 (imatinib era group, n = 185) and after January 2011 (2G-TKI era group, n = 425). All patients in the imatinib era group were initially treated with imatinib, whereas patients in the 2G-TKI era group were mostly treated with dasatinib (55%) or nilotinib (36%). However, outcomes including progression-free survival, overall survival, and CML-related death (CRD) did not differ significantly between groups. When stratified by risk scores, the prognostic performance of the ELTS score was superior to that of the Sokal score. Even though both scoring systems predicted CRD in the imatinib era, only the ELTS score predicted CRD in the 2G-TKI era. Notably, the outcome of patients classified as high-risk by ELTS score was more favorable in the 2G-TKI era group than in the imatinib era group. Thus, expanding treatment options may have improved patient outcomes in CP-CML, particularly in patients classified as high-risk by ELTS score.
这项研究调查了第二代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(2G-TKIs)获批用于一线治疗后,慢性期慢性髓性白血病(CP-CML)的治疗方式和结局变化。患者分为接受 TKI 治疗至 2010 年 12 月(伊马替尼时代组,n=185)和 2011 年 1 月后(2G-TKI 时代组,n=425)的两组。伊马替尼时代组所有患者最初均接受伊马替尼治疗,而 2G-TKI 时代组患者大多接受达沙替尼(55%)或尼洛替尼(36%)治疗。然而,两组患者的无进展生存期、总生存期和 CML 相关死亡(CRD)等结局均无显著差异。按风险评分分层时,ELTS 评分的预后性能优于 Sokal 评分。尽管两种评分系统均能预测伊马替尼时代的 CRD,但只有 ELTS 评分能预测 2G-TKI 时代的 CRD。值得注意的是,ELTS 评分高危患者的结局在 2G-TKI 时代组比伊马替尼时代组更有利。因此,扩大治疗选择可能改善了 CP-CML 患者的结局,尤其是 ELTS 评分高危患者。