J Hist Ideas. 2023;84(3):559-583. doi: 10.1353/jhi.2023.a901494.
This review essay examines three recent books about the advent of neoliberalism in the 1970s and 1980s. It argues that after three decades of scholarship that have mapped neoliberalism as a set of policies and an epoch, we are now witnessing a new turn in the literature focused on understanding why neoliberalism came to dominate the global political and economic order in the first place. This more ambitious agenda opens up complex questions of agency, intentionality, and causality. The "neoliberal transition debate" therefore concerns the dominant philosophy of history among intellectual and economic historians.
这篇评论文章考察了三本关于 20 世纪 70 年代和 80 年代新自由主义出现的最新著作。文章认为,经过三十年的研究,学者们已经将新自由主义描绘成一套政策和一个时代,我们现在正见证着文献的一个新转向,该转向侧重于理解新自由主义最初为何主导了全球政治和经济秩序。这一更加宏大的议程提出了关于行动者、意图和因果关系等复杂问题。因此,“新自由主义转型辩论”涉及到知识和经济史学家中的主流历史哲学。