Suppr超能文献

改变动物园饲养长颈鹿(Giraffa camelopardalis reticulata)饮食碳水化合物组成和物理形态的影响。

Effects of altering diet carbohydrate profile and physical form on zoo-housed giraffe Giraffa camelopardalis reticulata.

机构信息

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Busch Gardens Tampa, Tampa, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2024 Jul;108(4):1119-1133. doi: 10.1111/jpn.13957. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

Abstract

Unlike wild giraffe that primarily consume low starch browse, the preference of zoo-housed giraffe for consuming supplemental feeds over forage could increase the risk of digestive disorders such as ruminal acidosis. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of modifying a supplemental feed's non-fibre carbohydrate profile and physical form on nutritional, behavioural, and blood measures of giraffe in a zoological setting. Six non-lactating, adult, female reticulated giraffes were used in a two-pen modified reversal study using two dietary treatments in seven 21-day periods with data collected on days 15-21. Dietary treatments were a control feed comprised of commercially available products used at the time as the giraffe feed (GF) and an unpelleted experimental feed (EF). On a dry matter basis, GF and EF, respectively, contained 17.0% and 17.4% crude protein, 14.2% and 1.5% starch, 14.9% and 21.3% ethanol-soluble carbohydrates, 22.9% and 26.0% acid detergent fibre (ADF) and 9.50% and 14.9% ND-soluble fibre (NDSF), with modulus of fineness values of 3.62 and 4.82. Supplemental feeds, alfalfa hay, salt, and water were available for ad libitum consumption. Significance was declared at p ≤ 0.05. Intakes of hay, supplemental feeds, and total feed did not differ by diet (p > 0.28), though intakes of starch (0.93 and 0.12 kg; p = 0.05) and ADF (1.83 and 2.23 kg; p = 0.04) differed between GF and EF respectively. Giraffe behaviour values (min/48 h) were greater with EF for total eating (p = 0.04); diets were not detected as different for engagement in oral stereotypes (GF = 433, EF = 318 min/48 h; p = 0.22). Blood glucose was higher on GF than EF (99.0 and 82.3 mg/dL; p = 0.03). The lower EF blood glucose value is more similar to ranges reported for domesticated ruminants. No differences were detected for changes in body weight or body condition score in the 21-day periods (p > 0.32). Modification of supplemental feed carbohydrate profile and physical form can influence behaviour and blood glucose values of zoo-housed giraffe.

摘要

与主要以低淀粉草料为食的野生长颈鹿不同,动物园饲养的长颈鹿对补充饲料的偏好超过了对草料的偏好,这可能会增加瘤胃酸中毒等消化紊乱的风险。我们的目的是评估改变补充饲料中非纤维碳水化合物的比例和物理形态对动物园环境中长颈鹿的营养、行为和血液指标的影响。在一项采用两栏修改反转研究的实验中,六头非哺乳期、成年、雌性网纹长颈鹿被分为两个处理组,每个处理组在七个 21 天周期内进行两次处理,在第 15-21 天收集数据。处理组是当时作为长颈鹿饲料使用的商业产品组成的对照饲料(GF)和未经颗粒化的实验饲料(EF)。基于干物质,GF 和 EF 分别含有 17.0%和 17.4%粗蛋白、14.2%和 1.5%淀粉、14.9%和 21.3%乙醇可溶性碳水化合物、22.9%和 26.0%酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)和 9.50%和 14.9%中性洗涤可溶性纤维(NDSF),纤维细度值分别为 3.62 和 4.82。苜蓿干草、盐和水可自由采食补充饲料。当 p≤0.05 时,宣布结果具有统计学意义。饲料摄入量不因饮食而不同(p>0.28),尽管 GF 和 EF 之间的淀粉(0.93 和 0.12 千克;p=0.05)和 ADF(1.83 和 2.23 千克;p=0.04)摄入量存在差异。与 GF 相比,EF 时长颈鹿的总进食行为值(min/48h)更高(p=0.04);在口腔刻板行为方面,饮食没有差异(GF=433,EF=318 min/48h;p=0.22)。GF 时的血糖值高于 EF(99.0 和 82.3mg/dL;p=0.03)。EF 时较低的血糖值更类似于报道的家养反刍动物的范围。在 21 天期间,体重或身体状况评分没有差异(p>0.32)。补充饲料碳水化合物谱和物理形态的改变可以影响动物园饲养的长颈鹿的行为和血糖值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验