Naito Noritsugu, Takagi Hisato
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shizuoka Medical Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Apr 9:15266028241245282. doi: 10.1177/15266028241245282.
This network meta-analysis compares outcomes of optimal medical therapy (OMT) and pre-emptive thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection at different phases of chronicity.
MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through November 2023. Pooled short-term outcomes (short-term mortality, perioperative complications) and long-term outcomes (all-cause mortality, aortic-related mortality, aortic re-intervention rates) were calculated.
Systematic review identified 17 studies (2 randomized controlled trials, 3 propensity score matching, and 2 inverse probability weighting). Subacute-phase intervention had lower short-term mortality than the acute-phase (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval [CI]]=0.60 [0.38-0.94], p=0.027). No significant differences were observed in aortic rupture and paraplegia. Acute-phase TEVAR had a higher stroke incidence than subacute-phase intervention (HR [95% CI]=2.63 [1.36-5.09], p=0.042), chronic (HR [95% CI]=2.5 [1.03-6.2], p=0.043), and OMT (HR [95% CI]=1.57 [1.12-2.18], p=0.008). Acute-phase TEVAR had higher long-term all-cause mortality than subacute-phase intervention (HR [95% CI]=1.34 [1.03-1.74], p=0.03). Optimal medical therapy had elevated long-term all-cause mortality compared with subacute-phase TEVAR (HR [95% CI]=1.67 [1.25-2.33], p<0.001) and increased long-term aortic-related mortality vs acute-phase (HR [95% CI]=2.08 [1.31-3.31], p=0.002) and subacute-phase (HR [95% CI]=2.6 [1.62-4.18], p<0.01) interventions. No significant differences were observed in aortic re-intervention rates.
Pre-emptive TEVAR may offer lower all-cause mortality and aortic-related mortality than OMT. Considering lower short-term mortality, perioperative stroke rate, and long-term mortality, our findings support pre-emptive TEVAR during the subacute phase.
The optimal timing of pre-emptive thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection remains uncertain. This network meta-analysis suggests that the subacute phase (14-90 days from symptom onset) emerges as the optimal timing for pre-emptive TEVAR. This window is associated with lower rates of short-term complications and higher long-term survival rates compared with alternative strategies.
本网络荟萃分析比较了最佳药物治疗(OMT)和预防性胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)在不同慢性期对单纯B型主动脉夹层的治疗效果。
检索截至2023年11月的MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库。计算汇总的短期结局(短期死亡率、围手术期并发症)和长期结局(全因死亡率、主动脉相关死亡率、主动脉再干预率)。
系统评价纳入17项研究(2项随机对照试验、3项倾向评分匹配研究和2项逆概率加权研究)。亚急性期干预的短期死亡率低于急性期(风险比[HR][95%置信区间[CI]]=0.60[0.38 - 0.94],p = 0.027)。主动脉破裂和截瘫方面未观察到显著差异。急性期TEVAR的卒中发生率高于亚急性期干预(HR[95% CI]=2.63[1.36 - 5.09],p = 0.042)、慢性期(HR[95% CI]=2.5[1.03 - 6.2],p = 0.043)和OMT(HR[95% CI]=1.57[1.12 - 2.18],p = 0.008)。急性期TEVAR的长期全因死亡率高于亚急性期干预(HR[95% CI]=1.34[1.03 - 1.74],p = 0.03)。与亚急性期TEVAR相比,最佳药物治疗的长期全因死亡率升高(HR[95% CI]=1.67[1.25 - 2.3],p<0.001),与急性期(HR[95% CI]=2.08[1.31 - 3.31],p = 0.002)和亚急性期(HR[95% CI]=2.6[1.62 - 4.18],p<0.01)干预相比,长期主动脉相关死亡率增加。主动脉再干预率方面未观察到显著差异。
预防性TEVAR可能比OMT具有更低的全因死亡率和主动脉相关死亡率。考虑到较低的短期死亡率、围手术期卒中率和长期死亡率,我们的研究结果支持在亚急性期进行预防性TEVAR。
对于单纯B型主动脉夹层,预防性胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)的最佳时机仍不确定。本网络荟萃分析表明,亚急性期(症状出现后14 - 90天)是预防性TEVAR的最佳时机。与其他策略相比,这个窗口期短期并发症发生率较低,长期生存率较高。