Spece Hannah, Khachatryan Armen, Phillips Frank M, Lanman Todd H, Andersson Gunnar B J, Garrigues Grant E, Bae Hyun, Jacobs Joshua J, Kurtz Steven M
Drexel University Implant Research Core, 3401 Market St., Suite 345, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
The Disc Replacement Center, 3584 W 9000 S Suite 209, Salt Lake City, UT 84088, USA.
N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 Mar 6;18:100320. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100320. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Total disc replacement (TDR) is widely used in the treatment of cervical and lumbar spine pathologies. Although TDR infection, particularly delayed infection, is uncommon, the results can be devastating, and consensus on clinical management remains elusive. In this review of the literature, we asked: (1) What are the reported rates of TDR infection; (2) What are the clinical characteristics of TDR infection; and (3) How has infection been managed for TDR patients?
We performed a search of the literature using PubMed and Embase to identify studies that reported TDR infection rates, the identification and management of TDR infection, or TDR failures with positive cultures. Twenty database studies (17 focusing on the cervical spine and 3 on the lumbar spine) and 10 case reports representing 15 patients were reviewed along with device Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data reports.
We found a lack of clarity regarding how infection was diagnosed, indicating a variation in clinical approach and highlighting the need for a standard definition of TDR infection. Furthermore, while reported infection rates were low, the absence of a clear definition prevented robust data analysis and may contribute to underreporting in the literature. We found that treatment strategy and success rely on several factors including patient symptoms and time to onset, microorganism type, and implant positioning/stability.
Although treatment strategies varied throughout the extant literature, common practices in eliminating infection and reconstructing the spine emerged. The results will inform future work on the creation of a more robust definition of TDR infection and as well as recommendations for management.
全椎间盘置换术(TDR)广泛应用于颈椎和腰椎疾病的治疗。尽管TDR感染,尤其是迟发性感染并不常见,但后果可能是灾难性的,且临床管理方面仍未达成共识。在本次文献综述中,我们提出以下问题:(1)报道的TDR感染率是多少;(2)TDR感染的临床特征有哪些;(3)TDR患者的感染是如何处理的?
我们使用PubMed和Embase对文献进行检索,以确定报告TDR感染率、TDR感染的识别与处理或培养结果呈阳性的TDR失败病例的研究。我们回顾了20项数据库研究(17项聚焦于颈椎,3项聚焦于腰椎)以及10篇病例报告(代表15例患者),同时还参考了器械安全性和有效性数据总结报告。
我们发现对于感染的诊断方式缺乏明确界定,这表明临床方法存在差异,凸显了对TDR感染进行标准定义的必要性。此外,尽管报告的感染率较低,但缺乏明确的定义阻碍了有力的数据分析,可能导致文献中报告不足。我们发现治疗策略和成功率取决于多个因素,包括患者症状、发病时间、微生物类型以及植入物的位置/稳定性。
尽管现有文献中的治疗策略各不相同,但消除感染和重建脊柱的常见做法已显现出来。这些结果将为未来制定更完善的TDR感染定义以及管理建议的工作提供参考。