Fisicaro Samantha, Clement Alexandra, Tomaselli Michele, Penso Marco, Rota Alessandra, Menna Alessandro, Badano Luigi P, Muraru Denisa
Department of Cardiology, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Department of Cardiology, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Internal Medicine Department, "Grigore T. Popa", University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2024 Jul;37(7):690-697. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2024.03.018. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
Although cuff blood pressure measurement is a critical parameter to calculate myocardial work noninvasively, there is no recommendation about when and how to measure it. Accordingly, we sought to evaluate the effects of the timing during the echo study and the patient's position on the scanning bed during the cuff blood pressure measurement on myocardial work parameter calculations.
One hundred one consecutive patients (44 women, 66 ± 14 years) undergoing clinically indicated echocardiography were prospectively enrolled. During the echocardiographic study, we measured the cuff blood pressure 4 times, using a fully automatic digital blood pressure monitor applied to the right and left arm in the same position throughout the study: BP1, before the start of the echo study, with the patient lying in the supine position; BP2, after positioning the patients on their left side to start the echo study; BP3, at the time of the acquisition of the 3 apical views (4- and 2-chamber and long-axis) used to measured left ventricular global longitudinal strain; and BP4, at the end of the echo study with the patient again in the supine position.
Systolic blood pressureat BP1 was 147 ± 21 mm Hg. Between BP1 and BP2, it dropped by 17 ± 9 mm Hg (P < .05). Systolic blood pressure at BP3 was significantly lower than BP2 (130 ± 20 mm Hg vs 122 ± 18 mm Hg, P < .05), and at BP4 was significantly lower than at BP1 (-9 ± 13 mm Hg, P < .05). The average global longitudinal strain was -16% ± 3%. Accordingly, the global work index was 1,929 ± 441 mm Hg% at BP1, dropped to 1,717 ± 421 at BP2, decreased to 1,602 ± 351 mm Hg% at BP3, and increased to 1,815 ± 386 mm Hg% at BP4 (P < .001).
The timing during the echocardiography study and the patient's position on the scanning bed are critical determinants of the measured cuff systolic blood pressure and the resulting values of myocardial work parameters.
尽管袖带血压测量是无创计算心肌做功的关键参数,但对于何时以及如何进行测量尚无相关建议。因此,我们试图评估超声心动图检查期间的测量时间以及袖带血压测量时患者在检查床上的体位对心肌做功参数计算的影响。
前瞻性纳入101例连续接受临床指征超声心动图检查的患者(44例女性,年龄66±14岁)。在超声心动图检查期间,我们使用全自动数字血压监测仪在整个研究过程中于同一位置测量左右臂的袖带血压4次:BP1,在超声心动图检查开始前,患者仰卧位时测量;BP2,在患者左侧卧位开始超声心动图检查后测量;BP3,在获取用于测量左心室整体纵向应变的3个心尖视图(四腔心、两腔心和长轴视图)时测量;BP4,在超声心动图检查结束时,患者再次仰卧位时测量。
BP1时收缩压为147±21 mmHg。BP1和BP2之间,收缩压下降了17±9 mmHg(P<.05)。BP3时的收缩压显著低于BP2(130±20 mmHg对122±18 mmHg,P<.05),BP4时的收缩压显著低于BP1(-9±13 mmHg,P<.05)。平均整体纵向应变为-16%±3%。相应地,整体做功指数在BP1时为1929±441 mmHg%,在BP2时降至1717±421,在BP3时降至1602±351 mmHg%,在BP4时升至1815±386 mmHg%(P<.001)。
超声心动图检查期间的时间以及患者在检查床上的体位是测量袖带收缩压和心肌做功参数结果的关键决定因素。