Bur A, Hirschl M M, Herkner H, Oschatz E, Kofler J, Woisetschläger C, Laggner A N
Department of Emergency Medicine, Vienna General Hospital, University Clinics, Austria.
Crit Care Med. 2000 Feb;28(2):371-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200002000-00014.
To evaluate the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement according to the relation between cuff size and upper-arm circumference in critically ill patients.
Prospective data collection.
Emergency department in a 2,000-bed inner city hospital.
Thirty-eight patients categorized into three groups according to their upper-arm circumference (group I: 18-25 cm; group II: 25.1-33 cm; and group III: 33.1-47.5 cm) were enrolled in the study protocol.
In each patient, all three cuff sizes (Hewlett-Packard Cuff 40401 B, C, and D) were used to perform an oscillometric blood pressure measurement at least within 3 mins until ten to 20 measurements for each cuff size were achieved. Invasive mean arterial blood pressure measurement was done by cannulation of the contralateral radial artery with direct transduction of the systemic arterial pressure waveform. The corresponding invasive blood pressure value was obtained at the end of each oscillometric measurement.
Overall, 1,494 pairs of simultaneous oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measurements were collected in 38 patients (group I, n = 5; group II, n = 23; and group III, n = 10) over a total time of 72.3 hrs. Mean arterial blood pressure ranged from 35 to 165 mm Hg. The overall discrepancy between oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measurement was -6.7+/-9.7 mm Hg (p<.0001), if the recommended cuff size according to the upper-arm circumference was used (539 measurements). Of all the blood pressure measurements, 26.4% (n = 395) had a discrepancy of > or =10 mm Hg and 34.2% (n = 512) exhibited a discrepancy of > or =20 mm Hg. No differences between invasive and noninvasive blood pressure measurements were noted in patients either with or without inotropic support (-6.6 + 7.2 vs. -8.6 + 6.8 mm Hg; not significant).
The oscillometric blood pressure measurement significantly underestimates arterial blood pressure and exhibits a high number of measurements out of the clinically acceptable range. The relation between cuff size and upper-arm circumference contributes substantially to the inaccuracy of the oscillometric blood pressure measurement. Therefore, oscillometric blood pressure measurement does not achieve adequate accuracy in critically ill patients.
根据危重症患者袖带尺寸与上臂围的关系,评估示波法测量血压的准确性。
前瞻性数据收集。
一家拥有2000张床位的市中心医院的急诊科。
38例患者根据上臂围分为三组(I组:18 - 25厘米;II组:25.1 - 33厘米;III组:33.1 - 47.5厘米)纳入研究方案。
对每位患者,使用所有三种袖带尺寸(惠普袖带40401 B、C和D)在至少3分钟内进行示波法血压测量,直至每种袖带尺寸获得10至20次测量结果。通过对侧桡动脉置管直接转换体动脉压力波形进行有创平均动脉血压测量。在每次示波法测量结束时获取相应的有创血压值。
总体而言,在38例患者(I组,n = 5;II组,n = 23;III组,n = 10)中,共收集了1494对同步的示波法和有创血压测量数据,总时长为72.3小时。平均动脉血压范围为35至165毫米汞柱。如果使用根据上臂围推荐的袖带尺寸(539次测量),示波法和有创血压测量之间的总体差异为 -6.7±9.7毫米汞柱(p<0.0001)。在所有血压测量中,26.4%(n = 395)的差异≥10毫米汞柱,34.2%(n = 512)的差异≥20毫米汞柱。在接受或未接受血管活性药物支持的患者中,有创和无创血压测量之间未观察到差异(-6.6 + 7.2对 -8.6 + 6.8毫米汞柱;无显著差异)。
示波法血压测量显著低估动脉血压,且大量测量结果超出临床可接受范围。袖带尺寸与上臂围的关系在很大程度上导致了示波法血压测量的不准确。因此,示波法血压测量在危重症患者中未达到足够的准确性。