Chen Kewei, Deng Shaohui, Liu Zhuo, Zhang Hongxian, Ma Lulin, Zhang Shudong
Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Apr 18;56(2):326-331. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.02.020.
To investigate the effect of different surgical timing on the surgical treatment of renal angiomyolipoma (RAML) with rupture and hemorrhage.
The demographic data and perioperative data of 31 patients with rupture and hemorrhage of RAML admitted to our medical center from June 2013 to February 2023 were collected. The surgery within 7 days after hemorrhage was defined as a short-term surgery group, the surgery between 7 days and 6 months after hemorrhage was defined as a medium-term surgery group, and the surgery beyond 6 months after hemorrhage was defined as a long-term surgery group. The perioperative related indicators among the three groups were compared.
This study collected 31 patients who underwent surgical treatment for RAML rupture and hemorrhage, of whom 13 were males and 18 were females, with an average age of (46.2±11.3) years. The short-term surgery group included 7 patients, the medium-term surgery group included 12 patients and the long-term surgery group included 12 patients. In terms of tumor diameter, the patients in the long-term surgery group were significantly lower than those in the recent surgery group [(6.6±2.4) cm (10.0±3.0) cm, =0.039]. In terms of operation time, the long-term surgery group was significantly shorter than the mid-term surgery group [(157.5±56.8) min (254.8±80.1) min, =0.006], and there was no significant difference between other groups. In terms of estimated blood loss during surgery, the long-term surgery group was significantly lower than the mid-term surgery group [35 (10, 100) mL 650 (300, 1 200) mL, < 0.001], and there was no significant difference between other groups. In terms of intraoperative blood transfusion, the long-term surgery group was significantly lower than the mid-term surgery group [0 (0, 0) mL 200 (0, 700) mL, =0.014], and there was no significant difference between other groups. In terms of postoperative hospitalization days, the long-term surgery group was significantly lower than the mid-term surgery group [5 (4, 7) d 7 (6, 10) d, =0.011], and there was no significant difference between other groups.
We believe that for patients with RAML rupture and hemorrhage, reoperation for more than 6 months is a relatively safe time range, with minimal intraoperative bleeding. Therefore, it is more recommended to undergo surgical treatment after the hematoma is systematized through conservative treatment.
探讨不同手术时机对破裂出血性肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤(RAML)手术治疗的影响。
收集2013年6月至2023年2月在我院医学中心收治的31例RAML破裂出血患者的人口统计学资料和围手术期资料。将出血后7天内手术定义为短期手术组,出血后7天至6个月手术定义为中期手术组,出血后6个月以上手术定义为长期手术组。比较三组围手术期相关指标。
本研究共收集31例行RAML破裂出血手术治疗的患者,其中男性13例,女性18例,平均年龄(46.2±11.3)岁。短期手术组7例,中期手术组12例,长期手术组12例。肿瘤直径方面,长期手术组患者明显低于近期手术组[(6.6±2.4)cm 对(10.0±3.0)cm,P =0.039]。手术时间方面,长期手术组明显短于中期手术组[(157.5±56.8)分钟 对(254.8±80.1)分钟,P =0.006],其他组间差异无统计学意义。手术估计失血量方面,长期手术组明显低于中期手术组[35(10,100)mL 对650(300,1200)mL,P<0.001],其他组间差异无统计学意义。术中输血方面,长期手术组明显低于中期手术组[0(0,0)mL 对200(0,700)mL,P =0.014],其他组间差异无统计学意义。术后住院天数方面,长期手术组明显低于中期手术组[5(4,7)天 对7(6,10)天,P =0.011],其他组间差异无统计学意义。
我们认为,对于RAML破裂出血患者,出血6个月以上再次手术是相对安全的时间范围,术中出血最少。因此,更建议在通过保守治疗使血肿机化后再行手术治疗。