[Pharmacoinvasive strategy in Latin America. Why don't we see it as our option?].
作者信息
Arias-Mendoza Alexandra
机构信息
Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez. Ciudad de México, México Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez Ciudad de México México.
出版信息
Arch Peru Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2024 Mar 19;5(1):61-62. doi: 10.47487/apcyccv.v4i4.355. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
[Pharmacoinvasive strategy in Latin America. Why don't we see it as our option?].[拉丁美洲的药物介入策略。为何我们不将其视为我们的选择？]
Arch Peru Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2024 Mar 19;5(1):61-62. doi: 10.47487/apcyccv.v4i4.355. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
2
On pattern matching with mismatches and few don't cares.关于带有不匹配项和少量无关项的模式匹配。
Inf Process Lett. 2017 Feb;118:78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ipl.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
3
Real-World Evaluation of a Pharmacoinvasive Strategy for STEMI in Latin America: A Cost-Effective Approach with Short-Term Benefits.拉丁美洲ST段抬高型心肌梗死药物侵入性策略的真实世界评估：一种具有短期效益的成本效益方法。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023 Nov 10;19:903-911. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S432683. eCollection 2023.
4
5
What you don't see can hurt you.你看不见的东西可能会伤害你。
N Y State Dent J. 1993 Mar;59(3):45-7.
6
Feasibility and efficacy of delayed pharmacoinvasive therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死延迟药物介入治疗的可行性与疗效
World J Cardiol. 2023 Jan 26;15(1):23-32. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i1.23.
7
Pharmacoinvasive Strategy Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Clinical Practice: Insights From the Vital Heart Response Registry.临床实践中 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的药物侵入策略与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较：来自 Vital Heart Response 注册研究的见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct;12(10):e008059. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008059. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
8
Safety and Efficacy of a Pharmacoinvasive Strategy in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Patient Population Study Comparing a Pharmacoinvasive Strategy With a Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy Within a Regional System.药物侵入性策略在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中的安全性和疗效：比较区域性系统内药物侵入性策略与直接经皮冠状动脉介入策略的患者人群研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2014-2020. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.004.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacoinvasive Strategy Compared to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Country-Wide Registry.在ST段抬高型心肌梗死管理中，药物介入策略与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比的疗效和安全性：一项全国性前瞻性登记研究。
Ann Glob Health. 2020 Feb 5;86(1):13. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2632.
10
The effect of a 'don't know' option on test scores: number-right and formula scoring compared.“不知道”选项对考试成绩的影响：正确题数计分与公式计分的比较
Med Educ. 1999 Apr;33(4):267-75. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00292.x.
本文引用的文献
1
[Proposal for initial management of uncomplicated ST elevation myocardial infarction in centers without percutaneous coronary intervention capacity in Peru].[秘鲁无经皮冠状动脉介入治疗能力的中心对非复杂性ST段抬高型心肌梗死进行初始管理的建议]
Arch Peru Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2023 Dec 27;4(4):164-183. doi: 10.47487/apcyccv.v4i4.335. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
2
Real-World Evaluation of a Pharmacoinvasive Strategy for STEMI in Latin America: A Cost-Effective Approach with Short-Term Benefits.拉丁美洲ST段抬高型心肌梗死药物侵入性策略的真实世界评估：一种具有短期效益的成本效益方法。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023 Nov 10;19:903-911. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S432683. eCollection 2023.
3
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes.2023年欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.
4
Pharmacoinvasive Strategy vs Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results From a Study in Mexico City.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的药物介入策略与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对比：墨西哥城一项研究的结果
CJC Open. 2020 Nov 25;3(4):409-418. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.11.012. eCollection 2021 Apr.
5
Efficacy of early invasive management post-fibrinolysis in men versus women with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a subgroup analysis from Trial of Routine Angioplasty and Stenting after Fibrinolysis to Enhance Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TRANSFER-AMI).溶栓后早期侵入性治疗对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中男性与女性的疗效比较：来自溶栓后常规血管成形术和支架置入以改善急性心肌梗死再灌注（TRANSFER-AMI）试验的亚组分析。
Am Heart J. 2012 Sep;164(3):343-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.05.022. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
6
Early routine percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolysis vs. standard therapy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis.溶栓后早期常规经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死标准治疗的比较：一项荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2010 Sep;31(17):2156-69. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq204. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
7
Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials.急性心肌梗死的直接血管成形术与静脉溶栓治疗：23项随机试验的定量综述
Lancet. 2003 Jan 4;361(9351):13-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12113-7.
Zotero 插件