Jackson Memorial Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Miami, Florida.
University of Miami, Department of Surgery, Miami, Florida.
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;25(2):282-290. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18125.
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) performed by emergency physicians (EP) has emerged as an effective alternative to radiology department ultrasounds for the diagnosis of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Systematic reviews suggested good sensitivity and specificity overall for EP-performed POCUS for DVT diagnosis, yet high levels of heterogeneity were reported.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to provide the most up-to-date estimates of the accuracy of EP-performed POCUS for diagnosis of DVT and to explore potential correlations with test performance. We performed systematic searches in MEDLINE and Embase for original, primary data articles from January 2012-June 2021 comparing the efficacy of POCUS performed by EPs to the local standard. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 for individual articles are reported. We obtained summary measures of sensitivity, specificity, and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) using bivariate mixed-effects regression models. We performed meta-regression, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses as planned in the protocol CRD42021268799 submitted to PROSPERO.
Fifteen publications fit the inclusion criteria, totaling 2,511 examinations. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 90% (95% CI 82%-95%) and 95% (CI 91%-97%), respectively. Subgroup analyses by EP experience found significantly better accuracy for exams performed by EP specialists (93%, CI 88%-97%) vs trainees (77%, CI 60%-94%). Specificity for EP specialists (97%, CI 94%-99%) was higher than for trainees (87%, CI 76%-99%, = 0.01). Three-point compression ultrasound (CUS) was more sensitive than two-point CUS but was only statistically significant when limited to EP specialists (92% vs 88%, = 0.07, and 95% vs 88%, = 0.02, respectively).
Point-of-care ultrasound performed by emergency physicians is sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of suspected DVT when performed by trained attending EPs. Three-point compression ultrasound examination may be more sensitive than two-point CUS.
急诊医师(EP)进行的即时超声(POCUS)已成为放射科超声诊断下肢深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的有效替代方法。系统评价表明,EP 进行的 POCUS 总体上对 DVT 诊断具有良好的敏感性和特异性,但报告了高水平的异质性。
在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们旨在提供最新的 EP 进行的 POCUS 诊断 DVT 的准确性估计,并探索与测试性能的潜在相关性。我们对 MEDLINE 和 Embase 进行了系统搜索,以获取 2012 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月期间比较 EP 进行的 POCUS 与当地标准的原始、主要数据文章。报告了针对个别文章的诊断准确性研究质量评估-2。我们使用双变量混合效应回归模型获得了敏感性、特异性及其相应的 95%置信区间(CI)的汇总度量。我们根据协议 CRD42021268799 中计划的方案进行了荟萃回归、亚组和敏感性分析,该协议已提交给 PROSPERO。
15 篇出版物符合纳入标准,共计 2511 项检查。汇总的敏感性和特异性分别为 90%(95%CI 82%-95%)和 95%(CI 91%-97%)。按 EP 经验进行的亚组分析发现,由 EP 专家(93%,CI 88%-97%)进行的检查准确性明显更好,而由培训生(77%,CI 60%-94%)进行的检查准确性则较差。EP 专家(97%,CI 94%-99%)的特异性高于培训生(87%,CI 76%-99%, = 0.01)。三点压缩超声(CUS)比两点 CUS 更敏感,但仅在限于 EP 专家时具有统计学意义(92%对 88%, = 0.07,和 95%对 88%, = 0.02)。
当由受过培训的主治 EP 进行时,即时超声(POCUS)由急诊医师(EP)进行的 POUS 对疑似 DVT 的诊断既敏感又特异。三点压缩超声检查可能比两点 CUS 更敏感。