Suppr超能文献

急诊科即时超声检查(POCUS)诊断下肢深静脉血栓形成的准确性比较

Comparison of the Accuracy of Emergency Department-Performed Point-of-Care-Ultrasound (POCUS) in the Diagnosis of Lower-Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis.

作者信息

Pedraza García Jorge, Valle Alonso Joaquín, Ceballos García Pedro, Rico Rodríguez Francisca, Aguayo López Miguel Ángel, Muñoz-Villanueva María Del Carmen

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Valle de los Pedroches, Córdoba, Andalucía, Spain.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, UK.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2018 May;54(5):656-664. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.12.020. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Compression ultrasonography is the most effective diagnostic tool in the emergency department (ED) for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It has been demonstrated to be highly accurate and cost-effective.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of emergency physicians who performed three-point compression ultrasound (US) for suspected above-knee DVT within the context of using Wells score and D-dimer.

METHOD

This was a prospective diagnostic test assessment of three-point ultrasound conducted in a district general hospital of patients who presented to the ED with suspected DVT of the lower limb. The accuracy of three-point ultrasound carried out by the emergency physicians was assessed by comparison of the Doppler ultrasound carried out by the Radiology Department as reference standard. The study incorporated ultrasound alongside the Wells score and D-dimer.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients (66.1%) had a three-point compression point-of-care ultrasound in the ED and a second ultrasound performed by the Radiology Department. Bedside three-point compression ultrasound of the lower extremity performed by physicians in the ED had a sensitivity of 93.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83.8-97.3%) and a specificity of 90.0% (95% CI 78.6-95.7%), with an accuracy of 91.7% (95% CI 85-95.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency physicians can obtain a level of competence equivalent to that of radiologists, but it requires substantial training and practice to achieve and maintain this performance. Providers should be aware of their limitations and maintain regular training with ultrasound applications.

摘要

背景

加压超声检查是急诊科诊断深静脉血栓形成(DVT)最有效的诊断工具。已证明其具有高度准确性且成本效益高。

目的

本研究的目的是确定在使用Wells评分和D-二聚体的情况下,对疑似膝上DVT进行三点加压超声检查(US)的急诊医生的准确性。

方法

这是一项对在地区综合医院急诊科就诊的疑似下肢DVT患者进行的三点超声前瞻性诊断试验评估。通过将放射科进行的多普勒超声作为参考标准,评估急诊医生进行的三点超声的准确性。该研究将超声检查与Wells评分和D-二聚体相结合。

结果

共有109例患者(66.1%)在急诊科接受了三点加压即时超声检查,并由放射科进行了第二次超声检查。急诊科医生进行的下肢床边三点加压超声检查的敏感性为93.2%(95%置信区间[CI]83.8 - 97.3%),特异性为90.0%(95%CI 78.6 - 95.7%),准确性为91.7%(95%CI 85 - 95.6%)。

结论

急诊医生可以获得与放射科医生相当的能力水平,但需要大量的培训和实践才能达到并维持这种表现。医疗服务提供者应意识到自身的局限性,并持续进行超声应用方面的培训。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验