• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

点燃 NHS 患者数据利用的“火焰”:新闻媒体话语中的 care.data 争议。

'Kindling the fire' of NHS patient data exploitations: The care.data controversy in news media discourses.

机构信息

Centre for Health Innovation, Leadership and Learning (CHILL), Nottingham University Business School, Jubilee Campus, Wollaton Road, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2024 May;348:116824. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116824. Epub 2024 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116824
PMID:38598987
Abstract

This paper explores news media discourse about care.data: an NHS England programme of work for amalgamating and sharing patient data from primary care for planning and research. It was scrapped in 2016 after three years of public outcry, delays and around 1.5 million opt-outs. I examine UK news media coverage of this programme through the 'fire object' metaphor, focusing upon the visions of purpose and value it inspired, the abrupt discontinuities, juxtapositions and transformations it performed, and the matters of concern that went unheeded. Findings suggest that, in care.data's pursuit of a societal consensus on NHS patient data exploitations, various visions for new and fluid data flows brought to presence narratives of transforming the NHS, saving lives, and growing the economy. Other realities and concerns that mattered for certain stakeholders, such as data ownership and commercialisation, public engagement and informed consent, commitment and leadership, operational capabilities, and NHS privatisation agendas, remained absent or unsettled. False dichotomies kept the controversy alive, sealing its fate. I conclude by arguing that such failed programmes can turn into phantom-like objects, haunting future patient data schemes of similar aspirations. The paper highlights the role news media can have in understanding such energetic public controversies.

摘要

本文探讨了新闻媒体对 care.data 的报道:这是英格兰国民保健署(NHS England)的一项工作计划,旨在整合和共享初级保健中的患者数据,用于规划和研究。该计划在经历了三年的公众抗议、拖延和大约 150 万次退出后,于 2016 年被取消。我通过“消防对象”隐喻来考察英国新闻媒体对该计划的报道,重点关注它所激发的目的和价值愿景、它所执行的突然中断、并置和转变,以及被忽视的关注事项。研究结果表明,在 care.data 追求 NHS 患者数据利用方面的社会共识的过程中,各种关于新的、流动的数据流的愿景带来了 NHS 转型、拯救生命和促进经济增长的叙事。其他对某些利益相关者来说重要的现实和关注点,如数据所有权和商业化、公众参与和知情同意、承诺和领导力、运营能力以及 NHS 私有化议程,仍然缺失或未得到解决。错误的二分法使争议持续存在,决定了它的命运。我最后认为,此类失败的计划可能会变成幽灵般的对象,困扰未来具有类似抱负的患者数据计划。本文强调了新闻媒体在理解此类充满活力的公共争议方面可以发挥的作用。

相似文献

1
'Kindling the fire' of NHS patient data exploitations: The care.data controversy in news media discourses.点燃 NHS 患者数据利用的“火焰”:新闻媒体话语中的 care.data 争议。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 May;348:116824. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116824. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
2
Media content analysis of general practitioners' reactions to care.data expressed in the media: what lessons can be learned for future NHS data-sharing initiatives?媒体对全科医生对care.data的反应在媒体中的呈现内容分析:对于未来英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的数据共享计划能吸取哪些教训?
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 10;10(9):e038006. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038006.
3
Resisting big data exploitations in public healthcare: free riding or distributive justice?抵制公共医疗保健中的大数据滥用:搭便车还是分配正义?
Sociol Health Illn. 2019 Nov;41(8):1585-1599. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12969. Epub 2019 Aug 18.
4
Representations of the National Health Service (NHS) in UK print media.英国平面媒体对国民保健制度(NHS)的描述。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Mar 12;36(1):178-186. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa044.
5
Perceptions of anonymised data use and awareness of the NHS data opt-out amongst patients, carers and healthcare staff.患者、护理人员和医护人员对匿名数据使用的认知以及对英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)数据退出选项的了解。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 14;7(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00281-2.
6
Doing transformational change in the English NHS in the context of "big bang" redisorganisation.在“大爆炸式”重组的背景下,对英国国民医疗服务体系进行变革性改革。
J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(1):10-24. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2014-0019.
7
Engaging with stakeholders to inform the development of a decision-support tool for the NHS health check programme: qualitative study.与利益相关者合作,为 NHS 健康检查计划开发决策支持工具:定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 11;20(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05268-5.
8
Heroes, victims, and villains in news media narratives about COVID-19. Analysing moralising discourse in Swedish newspaper reporting during the spring of 2020.新冠疫情新闻媒体叙事中的英雄、受害者和恶棍。2020 年春季瑞典报纸报道中的道德化话语分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Feb;294:114718. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114718. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
9
Using anonymized NHS data without consent: a step too far?未经同意使用匿名化的英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)数据:是否过头了?
Br J Nurs. 2012;21(1):54-5. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.1.54.
10
Dissenting from care.data: an analysis of opt-out forms.对care.data持异议:退出表格分析
J Med Ethics. 2016 Dec;42(12):792-796. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103654. Epub 2016 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Lessons for synthetic data from care.data's past.从“医疗数据”(care.data)的过往中获取合成数据的经验教训。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Aug 9;8(1):511. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01928-0.
2
Factors influencing patients' willingness to share their digital health data for primary and secondary use: A theory- and evidence-based overview of reviews.影响患者分享其数字健康数据用于一级和二级用途意愿的因素:基于理论和证据的综述概述
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 30;11:20552076251340254. doi: 10.1177/20552076251340254. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
A United Kingdom nationally representative survey of public attitudes towards pharmacogenomics.
一项关于英国公众对药物基因组学态度的全国代表性调查。
QJM. 2025 Jun 1;118(6):423-433. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcaf035.