Weninger Viktor, Agócs Gergely, Kovács Norbert, Váncsa Szilárd, Hergár Luca, Baek Chan Ju, Hegyi Péter, Holnapy Gergely, Skaliczki Gábor
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Arthroscopy. 2025 Feb;41(2):304-315. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.03.035. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
To compare the efficacy of steroid injections to other injectable therapies in partial-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tears.
A systematic literature search was performed until October 25, 2021, in 3 databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE). Eligible studies compared the efficacy of steroid, hyaluronic acid (HA), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), the combination of HA and PRP (HA + PRP), and adipose-derived regenerative cells in RC tears. The primary outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS), Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome Score (CMS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form. Using paired and network meta-analysis, we calculated pooled mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
We included a total of 7 articles in the quantitative synthesis. In shorter periods, the HA + PRP combination was superior to the other substances we investigated (HA + PRP: VAS [0-4 weeks]: MD: -0.99 [95% CI, -1.62 to -0.36]; CMS [0-3 months]: 20.56 [95% CI, 16.18 to 24.94]. This combination was followed by the use of HA or PRP alone, depending on the duration of follow-up and the outcome being studied. In our study, short-term results suggest that saline is superior to steroids for partial tears, but this trend is reversed at 6-month follow-up.
The HA and PRP combination is currently the most effective in partial RC tear treatment in the short term. After 6 months, there is no meaningful difference, so the benefits of the combination are short term.
Level II, systematic review and meta-analysis of Level I and II studies.
比较类固醇注射与其他注射疗法治疗部分厚度肩袖(RC)撕裂的疗效。
截至2021年10月25日,在3个数据库(Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、Embase、MEDLINE)中进行了系统的文献检索。符合条件的研究比较了类固醇、透明质酸(HA)、富血小板血浆(PRP)、HA与PRP联合使用(HA + PRP)以及脂肪来源的再生细胞治疗RC撕裂的疗效。主要结局指标为视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Constant-Murley肩关节结局评分(CMS)和美国肩肘外科医师协会标准化肩关节评估表。使用配对和网状荟萃分析,我们计算了合并平均差(MDs)及95%置信区间(CIs)。
我们在定量综合分析中总共纳入了7篇文章。在较短时间内,HA + PRP联合使用优于我们研究的其他物质(HA + PRP:VAS[0 - 4周]:MD:-0.99[95%CI,-1.62至-0.36];CMS[0 - 3个月]:20.56[95%CI,16.18至24.94])。根据随访时间和所研究的结局,该联合使用之后是单独使用HA或PRP。在我们的研究中,短期结果表明,对于部分撕裂,生理盐水优于类固醇,但在6个月随访时这种趋势相反。
目前,HA和PRP联合使用在短期内是治疗部分RC撕裂最有效的方法。6个月后,无显著差异,因此该联合使用的益处是短期的。
II级,对I级和II级研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。