• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂与 2 型糖尿病出院人群肾脏结局的关系:基于人群的队列研究。

The association between sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors vs dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and renal outcomes in people discharged from hospital with type 2 diabetes: A population-based cohort study.

机构信息

Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Clinical Diabetes and Epidemiology, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Diabetes. 2024 Apr;16(4):e13507. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13507.

DOI:10.1111/1753-0407.13507
PMID:38599885
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11006598/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We investigated the association between post-hospital discharge use of sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) compared to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and the incidence of hospitalization for acute renal failure (ARF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in people with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked hospital and prescription data. Our cohort included people aged ≥30 years with type 2 diabetes discharged from a hospital in Victoria, Australia, from December 2013 to June 2018. We compared new users of SGLT-2is with new users of DPP-4is following discharge. People were followed from first dispensing of a SGLT-2i or DPP-4i to a subsequent hospital admission for ARF or CKD. We used competing risk models with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to estimate subhazard ratios.

RESULTS

In total, 9620 people initiated SGLT-2is and 9962 initiated DPP-4is. The incidence rate of ARF was 12.3 per 1000 person-years (median years of follow-up [interquartile range [IQR] 1.4 [0.7-2.2]) among SGLT-2i initiators and 18.9 per 1000 person-years (median years of follow-up [IQR] 1.7 [0.8-2.6]) among DPP-4i initiators (adjusted subhazard ratio with IPTW 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.86). The incidence rate of CKD was 6.0 per 1000 person-years (median years of follow-up [IQR] 1.4 [0.7-2.2]) among SGLT-2i initiators and 8.9 per 1000 person-years (median years of follow-up [IQR] 1.7 [0.8-2.6]) among DPP-4i initiators (adjusted subhazard ratio with IPTW 0.83; 95% CI 0.73-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world data support using SGLT-2is over DPP-4is for preventing acute and chronic renal events in people with type 2 diabetes.

摘要

背景

我们研究了 2 型糖尿病患者出院后使用钠葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂 (SGLT-2is) 与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂 (DPP-4is) 相比,与因急性肾衰竭 (ARF) 和慢性肾脏病 (CKD) 住院的发生率之间的关系。

方法

我们使用链接的医院和处方数据进行了回顾性队列研究。我们的队列包括 2013 年 12 月至 2018 年 6 月期间从澳大利亚维多利亚州的一家医院出院的年龄≥30 岁的 2 型糖尿病患者。我们比较了 SGLT-2is 的新使用者和 DPP-4is 的新使用者。患者从首次使用 SGLT-2i 或 DPP-4i 开始随访,直至因 ARF 或 CKD 住院。我们使用逆概率治疗加权 (IPTW) 竞争风险模型估计亚危险比。

结果

共有 9620 人开始使用 SGLT-2is,9962 人开始使用 DPP-4is。ARF 的发生率为 SGLT-2i 使用者为 12.3/1000 人年(中位数随访年限[四分位距[IQR]为 1.4[0.7-2.2]),DPP-4i 使用者为 18.9/1000 人年(中位数随访年限[IQR]为 1.7[0.8-2.6])(校正 IPTW 后的亚危险比为 0.78;95%置信区间[CI]为 0.70-0.86)。CKD 的发生率为 SGLT-2i 使用者为 6.0/1000 人年(中位数随访年限[IQR]为 1.4[0.7-2.2]),DPP-4i 使用者为 8.9/1000 人年(中位数随访年限[IQR]为 1.7[0.8-2.6])(校正 IPTW 后的亚危险比为 0.83;95%CI 为 0.73-0.94)。

结论

真实世界的数据支持在 2 型糖尿病患者中使用 SGLT-2is 而不是 DPP-4is 来预防急性和慢性肾脏事件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/945b/11006598/569217aa9902/JDB-16-e13507-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/945b/11006598/53d860fc89f0/JDB-16-e13507-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/945b/11006598/569217aa9902/JDB-16-e13507-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/945b/11006598/53d860fc89f0/JDB-16-e13507-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/945b/11006598/569217aa9902/JDB-16-e13507-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The association between sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors vs dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and renal outcomes in people discharged from hospital with type 2 diabetes: A population-based cohort study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂与 2 型糖尿病出院人群肾脏结局的关系:基于人群的队列研究。
J Diabetes. 2024 Apr;16(4):e13507. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13507.
2
Association between sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and a reduced risk of heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a real-world nationwide population-based cohort study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与 2 型糖尿病患者心力衰竭风险降低的相关性:一项真实世界的全国范围内基于人群的队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Jun 23;17(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0737-5.
3
Association of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors With Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与老年 2 型糖尿病患者心房颤动事件的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2235995. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.35995.
4
A population-based cohort defined risk of hyperkalemia after initiating SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP1 receptor agonists or DPP-4 inhibitors to patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes.一项基于人群的队列研究确定了慢性肾脏病合并2型糖尿病患者开始使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT-2)抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽1(GLP1)受体激动剂或二肽基肽酶4(DPP-4)抑制剂后发生高钾血症的风险。
Kidney Int. 2024 Mar;105(3):618-628. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.11.025. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
5
Healthcare resource utilization after initiation of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors or other glucose-lowering drugs in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.日本 2 型糖尿病患者启用钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂或其他降糖药物后医疗资源的利用情况。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Apr;23 Suppl 2:28-39. doi: 10.1111/dom.14289.
6
Comparison between sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors on the risk of incident cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus: A real-world evidence study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与二肽基肽酶 4 抑制剂在糖尿病患者新发癌症风险中的比较:一项真实世界证据研究。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar;40(3):e3784. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3784.
7
Use of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and the Incidence of Retinal Vein Occlusion in Taiwan.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂在台湾 2 型糖尿病患者中的应用与视网膜静脉闭塞的发生。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024 Jun 3;65(6):19. doi: 10.1167/iovs.65.6.19.
8
Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors vs. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors in Frail People With Diabetes Who Were Recently Hospitalized.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂对近期住院的体弱糖尿病患者的疗效比较
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 12;13:886834. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.886834. eCollection 2022.
9
Comparative Cardiovascular Effectiveness and Safety of SGLT-2 Inhibitors, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, and DPP-4 Inhibitors According to Frailty in Type 2 Diabetes.根据 2 型糖尿病患者的虚弱情况比较 SGLT-2 抑制剂、GLP-1 受体激动剂和 DPP-4 抑制剂的心血管有效性和安全性。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Nov 1;46(11):2004-2014. doi: 10.2337/dc23-0671.
10
Lower heart failure and chronic kidney disease risks associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor use in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients without established cardiovascular and renal diseases.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂在无心血管和肾脏疾病的日本 2 型糖尿病患者中的使用与较低的心衰和慢性肾脏疾病风险相关。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Apr;23 Suppl 2:19-27. doi: 10.1111/dom.14119.

引用本文的文献

1
Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors improve insulin resistance and β-cell function in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂改善2型糖尿病患者的胰岛素抵抗和β细胞功能:一项荟萃分析。
World J Diabetes. 2025 Jul 15;16(7):107335. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.107335.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors vs. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors in Frail People With Diabetes Who Were Recently Hospitalized.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂对近期住院的体弱糖尿病患者的疗效比较
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 12;13:886834. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.886834. eCollection 2022.
2
Association of SGLT2 inhibitors with cardiovascular, kidney, and safety outcomes among patients with diabetic kidney disease: a meta-analysis.SGLT2 抑制剂在糖尿病肾病患者中的心血管、肾脏和安全性结局的相关性:一项荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Mar 23;21(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01476-x.
3
SGLT2 Inhibitors and the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.
SGLT2 抑制剂与老年 2 型糖尿病患者急性肾损伤风险。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2022 Jun;79(6):858-867.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.09.015. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
4
Kidney Outcomes Associated With SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus Other Glucose-Lowering Drugs in Real-world Clinical Practice: The Japan Chronic Kidney Disease Database.真实世界临床实践中 SGLT2 抑制剂与其他降血糖药物对肾脏结局的影响:日本慢性肾脏病数据库。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Nov;44(11):2542-2551. doi: 10.2337/dc21-1081. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
5
A pre-specified analysis of the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease (DAPA-CKD) randomized controlled trial on the incidence of abrupt declines in kidney function.达格列净和慢性肾脏病不良结局预防(DAPA-CKD)随机对照试验中肾功能突然下降发生率的预先指定分析。
Kidney Int. 2022 Jan;101(1):174-184. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.09.005. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
6
Conducting Real-world Evidence Studies on the Clinical Outcomes of Diabetes Treatments.开展糖尿病治疗临床结局的真实世界证据研究。
Endocr Rev. 2021 Sep 28;42(5):658-690. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnab007.
7
Randomized Trial of Empagliflozin in Nondiabetic Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.恩格列净在射血分数降低的非糖尿病心力衰竭患者中的随机临床试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jan 26;77(3):243-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.008. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
8
The association of socioeconomic disadvantage and remoteness with receipt of type 2 diabetes medications in Australia: a nationwide registry study.澳大利亚 2 型糖尿病药物治疗与社会经济地位和地理位置的关联:一项全国性登记研究。
Diabetologia. 2021 Feb;64(2):349-360. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05304-3. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
9
Effectiveness and safety of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in Thai adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a real-world study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂在泰国 2 型糖尿病成人患者中的疗效和安全性:一项真实世界研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Oct;36(10):1601-1610. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1808454. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
10
Acute Kidney Injury Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus Other Glucose-Lowering Drugs: A Retrospective Cohort Study.使用 SGLT2 抑制剂与其他降血糖药物的 2 型糖尿病患者的急性肾损伤事件:一项回顾性队列研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Oct;76(4):471-479.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 May 25.