Bacsu Juanita-Dawne R, Spiteri Raymond J, Nanson Kate, Rahemi Zahra, Webster Claire, Norman Myrna, Stone Chantelle
School of Nursing, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC, Canada.
Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 27;15:1261113. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1261113. eCollection 2024.
Stigma of dementia is one of the greatest challenges for people living with dementia. However, there is little research on the different types of stigma of dementia in the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this scoping review is to synthesize the existing literature on dementia-related stigma (self, public, and structural stigma), during the pandemic.
Guided by Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework and PRISMA guidelines, CINAHL, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were searched for English language literature from January 2020 to June 2023. Inclusion criteria consisted of peer-reviewed, original research articles addressing stigma of dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data and steps were taken to ensure rigor.
Fifteen articles met our inclusion criteria. Four primary themes were identified including: 1) COVID-19 stereotypes and assumptions of dementia; 2) human rights issues and deprived dignity; 3) disparate access to health services and supports; and 4) cultural inequities and distrust.
The COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to the stigmatization of people living with dementia. Further research is needed to develop, implement, and evaluate interventions targeted towards the different types of dementia-related stigma (including self, public, and structural stigma). Moreover, our findings highlight the need for more collaborative research that prioritizes the lived experience and input of diverse people living with dementia. Research partnerships with diverse people living with dementia are vital to improving future pandemic planning. Only through evidence-informed research and lived experience can we begin to fully address the different types of dementia-related stigma and enhance the quality of life of people living with dementia.
痴呆症的污名化是痴呆症患者面临的最大挑战之一。然而,关于新冠疫情期间痴呆症不同类型污名化的研究却很少。本范围综述的目的是综合疫情期间有关痴呆症相关污名(自我污名、公众污名和结构性污名)的现有文献。
在阿克西和奥马利的范围综述框架及PRISMA指南的指导下,检索了CINAHL、EMBASE、谷歌学术、Medline、PsycINFO和科学网,以查找2020年1月至2023年6月期间的英文文献。纳入标准包括经同行评审的原创研究文章,这些文章探讨了新冠疫情期间痴呆症的污名化问题。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析,并采取措施确保严谨性。
15篇文章符合我们的纳入标准。确定了四个主要主题,包括:1)新冠疫情对痴呆症的刻板印象和假设;2)人权问题和尊严被剥夺;3)获得医疗服务和支持的差异;4)文化不平等和不信任。
新冠疫情加剧了痴呆症患者的污名化。需要进一步开展研究,以制定、实施和评估针对不同类型痴呆症相关污名(包括自我污名、公众污名和结构性污名)的干预措施。此外,我们的研究结果强调需要开展更多合作研究,优先考虑不同痴呆症患者的生活经历和意见。与不同痴呆症患者建立研究伙伴关系对于改进未来的疫情规划至关重要。只有通过基于证据的研究和生活经历,我们才能开始全面应对不同类型的痴呆症相关污名,并提高痴呆症患者的生活质量。