Manuelidis L
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1985;450:205-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb21494.x.
Mouse and human DNA sequences from centromeric and ribosomal domains were labeled with biotinylated deoxynucleotides and hybridized in situ to paraformaldehyde-fixed tissue culture cells. Centromeres were widely dispersed in most of these interphase nuclei. At late G2 phases of the cell cycle, centromeres appeared to coalesce and then to align in an orderly pattern, with discrete positional assignments for individuals chromosomes in metaphase and anaphase. Ribosomal cistrons were also organized in an orderly and defined fashion during mitosis. As soon as the nuclear membrane forms in early G1, centromeres rapidly disperse throughout the nucleus. Centromere patterns during G1 and S were indistinguishable in cultured cells, as determined by double-labeling experiments. Antibodies that bind to centric chromosomal proteins revealed the same patterns in cultured cells as those obtained with DNA sequence-specific probes. Large differentiated neurons display reproducible collections of centromeres in interphase that are very different from those seen in cultured cells. Neurons in widely divergent mammalian species, despite large differences in centromeric DNA sequences, maintain similar nuclear positions for these chromosomal segments. Similarly, ribosomal cistrons are positioned in comparable nuclear locales in neurons of divergent species. It is suggested that such arrangements reflect, or are necessary for, the function of a given cell type. Studies of large cerebellar neurons at critical times in development indicated a relative "movement" of centromeric domains, away from the nuclear membrane and toward the central nucleolar region. It is possible that the orderly and temporal positioning of centromeric, as well as of other chromosomal regions, is based on protein-nucleic acid interactions. Implications for trisomy 21 and other disorders involving chromosomal rearrangements, such as transposition, are considered from this perspective.
来自着丝粒和核糖体结构域的小鼠和人类DNA序列用生物素化的脱氧核苷酸进行标记,并原位杂交至经多聚甲醛固定的组织培养细胞。在大多数这些间期核中,着丝粒广泛分散。在细胞周期的G2晚期,着丝粒似乎聚集,然后以有序模式排列,在中期和后期各个染色体有离散的位置分配。核糖体顺反子在有丝分裂期间也以有序且明确的方式组织。一旦在G1早期核膜形成,着丝粒就迅速分散在整个细胞核中。通过双重标记实验确定,培养细胞中G1期和S期的着丝粒模式无法区分。与着丝粒染色体蛋白结合的抗体在培养细胞中显示出与用DNA序列特异性探针获得的相同模式。大的分化神经元在间期显示出可重复的着丝粒聚集,与培养细胞中所见的非常不同。广泛不同的哺乳动物物种中的神经元,尽管着丝粒DNA序列存在很大差异,但这些染色体片段在核中的位置相似。同样,核糖体顺反子在不同物种的神经元中位于相当的核区域。有人提出,这种排列反映了给定细胞类型的功能,或者对其功能是必要的。对发育关键时期的大脑小脑大神经元的研究表明,着丝粒结构域有相对的“移动”,从核膜移向核仁中央区域。着丝粒以及其他染色体区域的有序和暂时定位可能基于蛋白质 - 核酸相互作用。从这个角度考虑了21三体综合征和其他涉及染色体重排(如转座)的疾病的影响。