Langworthy Michael, Lascarides Peter, Ngai Wilson, Steele Kevin, Huang Yili
Southcoast Health Systems, New Bedford, MA, USA.
Northwell Health, Northern Westchester Hospital, Mt Kisco, NY, USA.
Drugs Context. 2024 Apr 5;13. doi: 10.7573/dic.2023-11-3. eCollection 2024.
Clinical trials on the use of viscosupplementation with hyaluronic acid (HA) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) are inconsistent, making it challenging to determine its value in clinical practice. One issue is the availability of various HA products on the market; differences in their chemical features can impact patient outcomes. Herein, we assess the efficacy and safety of three once-weekly intra-articular (IA) injections of Hylan G-F 20, a high-molecular-weight and highly crosslinked HA product, in patients with KOA. We hypothesized that Hylan G-F 20 would provide significant pain relief with no increased safety risk compared with IA saline (placebo).
This was a 26-week, patient-blinded and evaluator-blinded, single-centre, randomized placebo- controlled trial. Men or women ≥18 years of age with Larsen grade II or III KOA were included. Patients received IA injections of either Hylan G-F 20 or placebo once a week for 3 weeks. The primary endpoints were the week 12 and 26 visits. Primary efficacy outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, patient activity level and an overall assessment of clinical condition. Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs) that emerged during treatment. The primary analysis included the intention-to-treat population. An alpha level of 0.05 was used in the statistical analysis.
Thirty patients were included in the intention-to-treat population (15 per group). All efficacy outcomes were statistically significant in favour of Hylan G-F 20, except night pain and inactivity stiffness, for both patient- assessed (all =0.0001 at week 12) and evaluator-assessed (all =0.0001 at week 12 and =0.0004-0.0180 at week 26) measurements. There was also a greater proportion of symptom-free patients and those with a >50% improvement in their VAS scores, except night pain, in the Hylan G-F 20 group (=0.001-0.003 in patient-assessed scores and <0.0001 to 0.002 in evaluator-assessed scores at week 12). Two patients, one in each group, experienced an AE; no sequelae occurred, and no special treatment was required for either AE. No patients withdrew from the study prematurely due to an AE.
In patients with chronic idiopathic KOA, Hylan G-F 20 provides significant improvements in pain relief compared with placebo with no added safety concerns.
关于透明质酸(HA)用于膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)患者进行关节腔注射补充治疗的临床试验结果并不一致,这使得确定其在临床实践中的价值具有挑战性。一个问题是市场上有各种HA产品;它们化学特性的差异可能会影响患者的治疗效果。在此,我们评估了每周一次关节腔内(IA)注射三次Hylan G-F 20(一种高分子量且高度交联的HA产品)对KOA患者的疗效和安全性。我们假设与IA注射生理盐水(安慰剂)相比,Hylan G-F 20能显著缓解疼痛且不会增加安全风险。
这是一项为期26周、患者和评估者双盲、单中心、随机安慰剂对照试验。纳入年龄≥18岁、Larsen分级为II级或III级的KOA男性或女性患者。患者每周接受一次IA注射Hylan G-F 20或安慰剂,共3周。主要终点为第12周和第26周的访视。主要疗效指标包括视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分、患者活动水平和临床状况的总体评估。次要指标包括治疗期间出现的不良事件(AE)。主要分析包括意向性治疗人群。统计分析采用α水平为0.05。
意向性治疗人群中纳入了30例患者(每组15例)。在患者评估(第12周时所有指标均为P = 0.0001)和评估者评估(第12周时所有指标均为P = ~ 0.0001,第26周时为P = 0.0004~0.0180)测量中,除夜间疼痛和静息僵硬外,所有疗效指标在统计学上均显著有利于Hylan G-F 20。在Hylan G-F 20组中,无症状患者以及VAS评分改善>50%的患者比例也更高,夜间疼痛除外(第12周时患者评估评分P = 0.001~0.003,评估者评估评分P < 0.0001至0.002)。两组各有1例患者发生AE;未出现后遗症,且两例AE均无需特殊治疗。没有患者因AE提前退出研究。
在慢性特发性KOA患者中,与安慰剂相比,Hylan G-F 20能显著改善疼痛缓解情况,且无额外安全问题。