School of Public Administration, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Hongshan District, No. 129, Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Apr;31(20):30228-30242. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33217-w. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
Industrial land is currently the main carrier and important source of global carbon emissions, and as the world's largest developing country, China's large-scale and diversified industrial land supply has made it the world's largest carbon emitter. Therefore, researching the impact of different supply methods of industrial land on carbon emissions and its impact paths in China can help provide a reference for other countries to reduce carbon emissions from the perspective of urban industrial land management, which is of great significance for effectively promoting global carbon reduction. Based on this, this paper analyses the impact of different supply methods of industrial land on carbon emissions and its urban heterogeneity using the SYS-GMM and chain-mediated effects models for 285 cities in China from 2008 to 2020. The study found that, in general, the impact of different industrial land transfer modes on carbon emission has hysteresis and persistence. Agreement and listing transfer with government intervention can significantly exacerbate carbon emissions, while more market-based bidding and auction transfer can dampen carbon emissions. In terms of intermediary effects, the transfer of industrial land by agreement and listing will inhibit the rationalization and advancement of industrial structure, thus aggravating carbon emissions. The transfer of industrial land by bidding and auction will create barriers to entry and a crowding-out effect, promote the rationalization of industrial structure and the transformation and upgrading of industrial structure and moderate carbon emissions. In terms of city heterogeneity, there is urban heterogeneity in the impact of industrial land transfer on carbon emissions in cities with different economic types. Bidding and auction transfer for industrial land in both economically developed and less developed cities can promote carbon pollution. While the more developed urban economy makes the intermediary effect of industrial structure not significant. In the future, it is necessary to strictly control the scale of industrial land supply; the whole process supervision mechanism of industrial land allocation and differentiated industrial land supply strategies will provide useful experience for many developing countries in allocating industrial land to mitigate carbon emissions, generating effective contributions to global carbon emission reduction.
工业用地是当前全球碳排放的主要载体和重要来源,作为全球最大的发展中国家,中国大规模、多样化的工业用地供应使其成为全球最大的碳排放国。因此,研究中国工业用地供应方式的不同对碳排放的影响及其作用路径,有助于从城市工业用地管理角度为其他国家减排提供借鉴,对于有效推动全球减碳具有重要意义。基于此,本文利用 2008-2020 年中国 285 个城市的 SYS-GMM 和链式中介效应模型,分析了不同工业用地供应方式对碳排放的影响及其城市异质性。研究发现,总体而言,不同工业用地出让方式对碳排放的影响具有滞后性和持久性。政府干预下的协议和招拍挂出让会显著加剧碳排放,而更多市场化的招标和拍卖出让则会抑制碳排放。在中介效应方面,协议和招拍挂出让会抑制产业结构合理化和高级化,从而加剧碳排放;招标和拍卖出让会造成进入壁垒和排挤效应,促进产业结构合理化和产业结构转型升级,适度抑制碳排放。在城市异质性方面,不同经济类型城市工业用地出让对碳排放的影响存在城市异质性。经济发达和欠发达城市的工业用地招标和拍卖出让都能促进碳污染,而较发达城市的经济发展使得产业结构的中介效应不显著。未来需要严格控制工业用地供应规模;建立工业用地配置全过程监管机制;实施差异化工业用地供应策略,为众多发展中国家配置工业用地以缓解碳排放提供有益经验,为全球碳减排做出有效贡献。