Suppr超能文献

监禁还是治疗?监禁的边缘型和反社会型人格障碍患者在精神卫生保健利用和刑事司法历史方面的性别、种族和民族不平等。

Prison or treatment? Gender, racial, and ethnic inequities in mental health care utilization and criminal justice history among incarcerated persons with borderline and antisocial personality disorders.

机构信息

Veterans Integrated Services Network 2 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center.

Department of Psychology, University of California.

出版信息

Law Hum Behav. 2024 Apr;48(2):104-116. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000557.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Borderline and antisocial personality disorders are characterized by pervasive psychosocial impairment, disproportionate criminal justice involvement, and high mental health care utilization. Although some evidence suggests that systemic bias may contribute to demographic inequities in criminal justice and mental health care among persons experiencing these mental health conditions, no research to date has explicitly examined such differences.

HYPOTHESES

Women and White persons would be more likely to endorse internalizing symptoms and have a more extensive history of mental health service utilization, whereas men, persons from minoritized racial groups, and persons identifying as Hispanic/Latino would be more likely to endorse externalizing symptoms and have more extensive histories of involvement with the criminal justice system.

METHOD

This study examined gender, racial, and ethnic differences in symptom presentation, criminal justice history, and mental health care utilization in a sample of 314 adults with comorbid borderline and antisocial personality disorders enrolled in prison-based substance use treatment programs in the United States.

RESULTS

Results suggested that men with these personality disorders were more likely to have early extensive criminal justice involvement, whereas women and White people had more extensive mental health treatment histories. Women were also more likely to endorse a range of internalizing symptoms, and White and non-Hispanic participants were more likely to endorse a history of reckless behavior. Notably, however, many associations-particularly, racial differences in symptom presentation and mental health utilization history and gender differences in symptom presentation-did not persist after we controlled for preincarceration employment and educational attainment.

CONCLUSION

Results highlight a range of gender, racial, and ethnic inequities in criminal justice involvement and mental health utilization among this high-risk high-need population. Findings attest to the likely impact of societal, structural, and systemic factors on trajectories of persons affected by this comorbidity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

边缘型和反社会型人格障碍的特点是普遍存在的社会心理障碍、不成比例的刑事司法参与度,以及高心理健康保健利用率。尽管有一些证据表明,系统偏见可能导致在经历这些心理健康状况的人群中刑事司法和心理健康保健方面存在人口统计学上的不平等,但迄今为止,没有研究明确检查过这些差异。

假设

女性和白人更有可能认可内化症状,并有更广泛的心理健康服务利用史,而男性、少数族裔群体的人以及自认为西班牙裔/拉丁裔的人更有可能认可外化症状,并有更广泛的参与刑事司法系统的历史。

方法

本研究在美国基于监狱的物质使用治疗计划中,对 314 名患有共病边缘型和反社会型人格障碍的成年人样本,考察了症状表现、刑事司法史和心理健康保健利用方面的性别、种族和民族差异。

结果

结果表明,患有这些人格障碍的男性更有可能早期广泛地卷入刑事司法,而女性和白人则有更广泛的心理健康治疗史。女性也更有可能认可一系列内化症状,而白人非西班牙裔参与者更有可能认可鲁莽行为史。然而,值得注意的是,许多关联——特别是症状表现和心理健康利用史方面的种族差异,以及症状表现方面的性别差异——在我们控制了入狱前的就业和教育程度后就不再存在了。

结论

结果突出了在这个高风险高需求人群中,在刑事司法参与和心理健康利用方面存在的一系列性别、种族和民族不平等。这些发现证明了社会、结构和系统因素对受这种共病影响的人群轨迹的可能影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验