Suppr超能文献

R.I.M.E. 和理由:多站点客观结构化临床考试增强以消除评分膨胀。

R.I.M.E. and reason: multi-station OSCE enhancement to neutralize grade inflation.

机构信息

Internal Medicine, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA.

Evaluation Analyst in the Office of Medical Education, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.

出版信息

Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2339040. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2339040. Epub 2024 Apr 11.

Abstract

To offset grade inflation, many clerkships combine faculty evaluations with objective assessments including the Medical Examiners Subject Examination (NBME-SE) or Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), however, standardized methods are not established. Following a curriculum transition removing faculty clinical evaluations from summative grading, final clerkship designations of fail (F), pass (P), and pass-with-distinction (PD) were determined by combined NBME-SE and OSCE performance, with overall PD for the clerkship requiring meeting this threshold in both. At the time, 90% of students achieved PD on the Internal Medicine (IM) OSCE resulting in overall clerkship grades primarily determined by the NBME-SE. The clerkship sought to enhance the OSCE to provide a more thorough objective clinical skills assessment, offset grade inflation, and reduce the NBME-SE primary determination of the final clerkship grade. The single-station 43-point OSCE was enhanced to a three-station 75-point OSCE using the Reporter-Interpreter-Manager-Educator (RIME) framework to align patient encounters with targeted assessments of progressive skills and competencies related to the clerkship rotation. Student performances were evaluated pre- and post-OSCE enhancement. Student surveys provided feedback about the clinical realism of the OSCE and the difficulty. Pre-intervention OSCE scores were more tightly clustered ( = 5.65%) around a high average performance with scores being highly negatively skewed. Post-intervention OSCE scores were more dispersed ( = 6.88%) around a lower average with scores being far less skewed resulting in an approximately normal distribution. This lowered the total number of students achieving PD on the OSCE and PD in the clerkship, thus reducing the relative weight of the NMBE-SE in the overall clerkship grade. Student response was positive, indicating the examination was fair and reflective of their clinical experiences. Through structured development, OSCE assessment can provide a realistic and objective measurement of clinical performance as part of the summative evaluation of students.

摘要

为了抵消成绩膨胀,许多实习课程将教师评估与客观评估相结合,包括医学考试委员会学科考试(NBME-SE)或客观结构化临床考试(OSCE),但尚未建立标准化方法。在课程过渡中,从总结性评分中删除教师临床评估后,最终实习指定的失败(F)、通过(P)和优秀(PD)是根据 NBME-SE 和 OSCE 的表现来确定的,整个实习的 PD 要求两者都达到这个门槛。当时,90%的学生在内科 OSCE 中获得 PD,导致整个实习成绩主要由 NBME-SE 决定。该实习课程旨在增强 OSCE,以提供更全面的客观临床技能评估,抵消成绩膨胀,并减少 NBME-SE 对最终实习成绩的主要决定。单一站点的 43 分 OSCE 通过使用报告者-解释者-经理-教育家(RIME)框架增强为三站点的 75 分 OSCE,使患者接触与与实习轮转相关的渐进技能和能力的目标评估保持一致。学生在 OSCE 增强前后的表现进行了评估。学生调查提供了有关 OSCE 的临床现实性和难度的反馈。干预前 OSCE 分数围绕着高平均表现更加集中( = 5.65%),分数呈高度负偏态。干预后 OSCE 分数围绕着较低的平均分数更加分散( = 6.88%),分数偏差较小,导致大致正态分布。这降低了在 OSCE 和实习中获得 PD 的学生人数,从而降低了 NBME-SE 在整个实习成绩中的相对权重。学生的反应是积极的,表明考试是公平的,反映了他们的临床经验。通过结构化开发,OSCE 评估可以作为学生总结性评估的一部分,提供对临床表现的现实和客观测量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a53/11011230/fe112fe529ec/ZMEO_A_2339040_F0001_B.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验