Spine, Head and Pain Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Spine, Head and Pain Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/DanneelsLieven.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2024 Jun;71:102953. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.102953. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
Impairments in lumbopelvic sensorimotor control (SMC) are thought to be one of the underlying mechanisms for the recurrence and persistence of low back pain (LBP). As such, lumbopelvic SMC tests are frequently included in the clinical examination of patients with LBP.
To evaluate convergent and known-groups validity of clinically assessed lumbopelvic SMC tests in patients with LBP according to COSMIN guidelines.
Systematic review METHODS: Five electronic databases were searched until December 2023. Studies examining convergent or known-groups validity of lumbopelvic SMC tests assessed via inspection or palpation in patients with LBP were included. Known-groups validity had to be assessed between patients with LBP and pain-free persons. Two independent researchers appraised risk of bias and quality of evidence (QoE) using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist and modified GRADE approach, respectively. Results for known-groups validity were reported separately for single tests and test-clusters.
Twelve studies (946 participants) were included. Three studies investigated convergent validity of three single tests. Regarding known-groups validity, six studies evaluated six single tests and four studies investigated two test-clusters. For only one test, both convergent and known-groups were assessed. The QoE for tests showing sufficient convergent or known-groups validity was (very) low, whereas QoE was moderate for single tests or test-clusters with insufficient known-groups validity.
All clinically assessed lumbopelvic SMC tests with sufficient convergent or known-groups validity had (very) low QoE. Therefore, test outcomes should be interpreted cautiously and strong reliance on these outcomes for clinical decision-making can currently not be recommended.
腰骶传感器运动控制(SMC)损伤被认为是腰痛(LBP)复发和持续存在的潜在机制之一。因此,腰骶 SMC 测试经常被纳入 LBP 患者的临床检查中。
根据 COSMIN 指南,评估 LBP 患者临床评估的腰骶 SMC 测试的收敛和已知组有效性。
系统评价
直到 2023 年 12 月,我们在五个电子数据库中进行了搜索。纳入了评估通过触诊或触诊评估的 LBP 患者的腰骶 SMC 测试的收敛或已知组有效性的研究。已知组有效性必须在 LBP 患者和无疼痛患者之间进行评估。两名独立的研究人员使用 COSMIN 偏倚风险检查表和改良 GRADE 方法分别评估偏倚风险和证据质量(QoE)。已知组有效性的结果分别针对单个测试和测试簇进行报告。
纳入了 12 项研究(946 名参与者)。三项研究调查了三项单测试的收敛有效性。关于已知组有效性,六项研究评估了六项单测试,四项研究调查了两个测试簇。只有一项测试同时评估了收敛和已知组。显示出足够的收敛或已知组有效性的测试的 QoE 为(非常)低,而单测试或具有不足的已知组有效性的测试簇的 QoE 为中等。
所有具有足够收敛或已知组有效性的临床评估腰骶 SMC 测试的 QoE 都非常低。因此,应该谨慎解释测试结果,目前不能强烈依赖这些结果来进行临床决策。