Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8S1):S59-S64. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.066. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
Femur-first (FF) technique for mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been described as an alternative to tibia-first (TF) technique. The aim of this study was to compare the radiographic results in UKAs using FF or TF techniques and their influence on failure rates.
We retrospectively reviewed 288 UKAs with a minimum 2-year follow-up. There were 147 knees in the TF and 141 knees in the FF cohorts. Alignment parameters and overhang were assessed as outliers and far outliers. The mean follow-up was 6 years (range, 2 to 16), the mean age was 63 years (range, 27 to 92), and 45% of patients were women. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were carried out with Cox regression models.
There were 13 and 6 revisions in the TF and FF cohorts, respectively. The FF had lower rates of femoral coronal alignment (FCA) or femoral sagittal alignment outliers compared to the TF (5.7% versus 19%, P = .011). Tibial coronal alignment and tibial sagittal alignment did not significantly differ between the techniques (22.7% in FF versus 29.9% in TF, P = .119). Overhang outliers did not differ significantly between the groups. Younger age was associated with a higher revision rate (P = .006), while FF versus TF, sex, body mass index, and postoperative mechanical axis did not show statistically significant associations. In multivariate analysis, FCA outliers and younger age were significantly associated with revision.
The FF technique in mobile-bearing UKA resulted in fewer FCA outliers compared to TF. Despite improved knee alignment with the FF technique, FCA outliers and younger age were associated with a higher revision rate, independent of technique.
股骨-first(FF)技术在活动衬垫单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)中已被描述为替代胫骨-first(TF)技术的方法。本研究的目的是比较使用 FF 或 TF 技术的 UKA 的影像学结果及其对失败率的影响。
我们回顾性分析了 288 例至少随访 2 年的 UKA。TF 组有 147 个膝关节,FF 组有 141 个膝关节。评估了对线参数和覆盖物是否为异常值和远异常值。平均随访时间为 6 年(范围 2 至 16 年),平均年龄为 63 岁(范围 27 至 92 岁),45%的患者为女性。使用 Cox 回归模型进行了单变量和多变量统计分析。
TF 组和 FF 组分别有 13 例和 6 例翻修。FF 组股骨冠状位对线(FCA)或股骨矢状位对线异常值的发生率低于 TF 组(5.7%比 19%,P =.011)。FF 组的胫骨冠状位对线和胫骨矢状位对线与 TF 组相比无显著差异(FF 组为 22.7%,TF 组为 29.9%,P =.119)。两组之间覆盖物异常值无显著差异。年龄较小与翻修率较高相关(P =.006),而 FF 与 TF、性别、体重指数和术后机械轴之间无统计学显著关联。多变量分析显示,FCA 异常值和年龄较小与翻修显著相关。
与 TF 相比,活动衬垫 UKA 的 FF 技术导致 FCA 异常值更少。尽管 FF 技术改善了膝关节对线,但 FCA 异常值和年龄较小与翻修率较高相关,与技术无关。