Study on the Efficacy and Clinical Value of Aminophylline and Doxofylline in the Clinical Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

OBJECTIVE

To study and compare the efficacy and clinical value of aminophylline and doxofylline in the clinical treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHOD

The study analyzed the clinical data of 92 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who received either aminophylline or doxofylline treatment in the hospital from January 2020 to June 2022. The patients were divided into a control group composed of 46 COPD patients who received aminophylline treatment and a study group composed of 46 COPD patients who received doxofylline treatment. The two groups' total effective rate and incidence of adverse reactions were compared. The serum inflammatory factor indicators, symptom scores, pulmonary ventilation function, arterial blood gas, chest and lung responsiveness, sleep status indicators, and quality of life scores of the two groups before and after treatment were compared.

RESULTS

At the end of treatment, the total effective rate was higher in the study group compared to the control group (P < .05). Regarding adverse reactions, the study group's total incidence was lower than the control group's (P < .05). After treatment, the levels of serum inflammatory factor indicators of CRP, PCT, and TNF- α in both groups were decreased compared with those before treatment; while comparing the above indicators between the groups, it was found that the values in the study group were lower (all P < .05). After treatment, the scores of symptoms such as cough, expectoration, and shortness of breath in both groups of patients were significantly lower than before treatment, while compared to the control group, the scores of all symptoms were lower in the study group (P < .05). After treatment, compared with FEV1, FEV1/FVC, PaO2, and PaCO2 before treatment, the above indicators in both groups were significantly improved. However, compared with various indicators in the control group, the values of FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and PaO2 in the study group were higher, while the values of PaCO2 in the study group were lower (all P < .05). After treatment, the measured values of indicators such as thoracic compliance, lung compliance, and total compliance in the two groups were significantly higher compared with those before the treatment, while compared to the control group, the values of all indicators in the study group were higher (P < .05). After treatment, compared with the control group's monitoring of various indicators of nighttime sleep, the study group obtained better data on monitoring of sleep latency and actual sleep duration. The group obtained lower scores in sleep quality evaluation, while the two groups significantly improved their sleep-related data in night-time monitoring and evaluation compared to those before treatment, with all P < .05. After treatment, the scores in various aspects of the quality of life of patients in both groups were significantly increased compared to those before treatment, and after comparing the scores of various quality of life between the two groups, it was found that the study group was higher than the control group (all P < .05).

CONCLUSION

After the onset of COPD, doxofylline treatment can achieve better effects than aminophylline treatment.