Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia.
Musculoskeletal Education and Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Orthopaedics and Neurosciences, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, Virginia.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Apr 17;106(8):674-680. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00597. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
In-person hand therapy is commonly prescribed for rehabilitation after thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty but may be burdensome to patients because of the need to travel to appointments. Asynchronous, video-assisted home therapy is a method of care in which videos containing instructions and exercises are provided to the patient, without the need for in-person or telemedicine visits. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of providing video-only therapy (VOT) as compared with scheduled in-person therapy (IPT) after thumb CMC arthroplasty.
We performed a single-site, prospective, randomized controlled trial of patients undergoing primary thumb CMC arthroplasty without an implant. The study included 50 women and 8 men, with a mean age of 61 years (range, 41 to 83 years). Of these, 96.6% were White, 3.4% were Black, and 13.8% were of Hispanic ethnicity. The primary outcome measure was the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) score. Subjects in the VOT group were provided with 3 videos of home exercises to perform. Subjects in the control group received standardized IPT with a hand therapist. Improvements in the PROMIS UE score from preoperatively to 12 weeks and 1 year postoperatively were compared.
Fifty-eight subjects (29 control, 29 experimental) were included in the analysis at the 12-week time point, and 54 (27 control, 27 experimental) were included in the analysis at the 1-year time point. VOT was noninferior to IPT for the PROMIS UE score at 12 weeks and 1 year postoperatively, with a difference of mean improvement (VOT - IPT) of 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.6 to 6.6) and 2.2 (95% CI, -3.0 to 7.3), respectively, both of which were below the minimal clinically important difference (4.1). Patients in the VOT group potentially saved on average 201.3 miles in travel.
VOT was noninferior to IPT for upper extremity function after thumb CMC arthroplasty. Time saved in commutes was considerable for those who did not attend IPT.
Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
手部掌腕关节(CMC)成形术后,通常会进行物理治疗,但由于需要前往就诊,对患者来说可能会带来不便。非同步、视频辅助家庭治疗是一种通过提供包含说明和练习的视频来为患者提供治疗的方法,无需面对面或远程医疗就诊。本研究的目的是评估在拇指 CMC 成形术后提供仅视频治疗(VOT)与计划的门诊治疗(IPT)相比的有效性。
我们对接受原发性拇指 CMC 成形术且无植入物的患者进行了一项单站点、前瞻性、随机对照试验。该研究包括 50 名女性和 8 名男性,平均年龄 61 岁(范围 41 岁至 83 岁)。其中,96.6%为白人,3.4%为黑人,13.8%为西班牙裔。主要结局测量指标为患者报告的结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)上肢(UE)评分。VOT 组的患者被提供 3 个家庭练习视频。对照组的患者接受了手部治疗师的标准化 IPT。比较术前至术后 12 周和 1 年时 PROMIS UE 评分的改善情况。
在 12 周时间点,58 名受试者(29 名对照组,29 名实验组)被纳入分析,在 1 年时间点,54 名受试者(27 名对照组,27 名实验组)被纳入分析。VOT 在术后 12 周和 1 年时与 IPT 相比非劣效于 PROMIS UE 评分,平均改善差异(VOT-IPT)分别为 1.5(95%置信区间[CI],-3.6 至 6.6)和 2.2(95%CI,-3.0 至 7.3),均低于最小临床重要差异(4.1)。VOT 组的患者在旅行方面平均节省了 201.3 英里。
在拇指 CMC 成形术后,VOT 与 IPT 相比在上肢功能方面非劣效。对于那些未接受 IPT 的患者来说,通勤时间的节省是相当可观的。
治疗水平 I。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者指南。