• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将多基因风险纳入莱斯特风险评估评分,以预测 10 年内 2 型糖尿病的发病风险。

Incorporating polygenic risk into the Leicester Risk Assessment score for 10-year risk prediction of type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2024 Apr;18(4):102996. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2024.102996. Epub 2024 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.dsx.2024.102996
PMID:38608567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11913737/
Abstract

AIMS

We evaluated whether incorporating information on ethnic background and polygenic risk enhanced the Leicester Risk Assessment (LRA) score for predicting 10-year risk of type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

The sample included 202,529 UK Biobank participants aged 40-69 years. We computed the LRA score, and developed two new risk scores using training data (80% sample): LRArev, which incorporated additional information on ethnic background, and LRAprs, which incorporated polygenic risk for type 2 diabetes. We assessed discriminative and reclassification performance in a test set (20% sample). Type 2 diabetes was ascertained using primary care, hospital inpatient and death registry records.

RESULTS

Over 10 years, 7,476 participants developed type 2 diabetes. The Harrell's C indexes were 0.796 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.785, 0.806), 0.802 (95% CI 0.792, 0.813), and 0.829 (95% CI 0.820, 0.839) for the LRA, LRArev and LRAprs scores, respectively. The LRAprs score significantly improved the overall reclassification compared to the LRA (net reclassification index [NRI] = 0.033, 95% CI 0.015, 0.049) and LRArev (NRI = 0.040, 95% CI 0.024, 0.055) scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Polygenic risk moderately improved the performance of the existing LRA score for 10-year risk prediction of type 2 diabetes.

摘要

目的

我们评估了在预测 2 型糖尿病 10 年风险时,纳入民族背景和多基因风险信息是否能增强莱斯特风险评估(LRA)评分。

方法

本研究样本包括 202529 名年龄在 40-69 岁的英国生物库参与者。我们计算了 LRA 评分,并使用训练数据(80%的样本)开发了两个新的风险评分:LRArev,它纳入了民族背景的额外信息;LRAprs,它纳入了 2 型糖尿病的多基因风险。我们在测试集(20%的样本)中评估了区分和重新分类性能。2 型糖尿病是通过初级保健、住院和死亡登记记录确定的。

结果

在 10 年内,7476 名参与者发生了 2 型糖尿病。Harrell 的 C 指数分别为 0.796(95%置信区间[CI]0.785,0.806)、0.802(95%CI0.792,0.813)和 0.829(95%CI0.820,0.839),分别为 LRA、LRArev 和 LRAprs 评分。与 LRA(净重新分类指数[NRI]为 0.033,95%CI0.015,0.049)和 LRArev(NRI为 0.040,95%CI0.024,0.055)相比,LRAprs 评分显著提高了整体重新分类。

结论

多基因风险适度提高了现有的 LRA 评分对 2 型糖尿病 10 年风险预测的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5a/11913737/9b4f319dfea3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5a/11913737/c5b6c8ba50e4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5a/11913737/9b4f319dfea3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5a/11913737/c5b6c8ba50e4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd5a/11913737/9b4f319dfea3/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Incorporating polygenic risk into the Leicester Risk Assessment score for 10-year risk prediction of type 2 diabetes.将多基因风险纳入莱斯特风险评估评分,以预测 10 年内 2 型糖尿病的发病风险。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2024 Apr;18(4):102996. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2024.102996. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
2
Assessing the Value of Incorporating a Polygenic Risk Score with Nongenetic Factors for Predicting Breast Cancer Diagnosis in the UK Biobank.评估将多基因风险评分与非遗传因素相结合用于预测英国生物银行中乳腺癌诊断的价值。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Jun 3;33(6):812-820. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1432.
3
Predictive Accuracy of a Polygenic Risk Score Compared With a Clinical Risk Score for Incident Coronary Heart Disease.多基因风险评分与临床风险评分预测冠心病事件的准确性比较。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 18;323(7):627-635. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.21782.
4
Predictive Accuracy of a Polygenic Risk Score-Enhanced Prediction Model vs a Clinical Risk Score for Coronary Artery Disease.多基因风险评分增强预测模型与临床风险评分对冠状动脉疾病预测的准确性比较。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 18;323(7):636-645. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.22241.
5
Polygenic and clinical risk scores and their impact on age at onset and prediction of cardiometabolic diseases and common cancers.多基因和临床风险评分及其对发病年龄和心血管代谢疾病及常见癌症预测的影响。
Nat Med. 2020 Apr;26(4):549-557. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0800-0. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
6
The Clinical Usefulness of a Glaucoma Polygenic Risk Score in 4 Population-Based European Ancestry Cohorts.青光眼多基因风险评分在4个欧洲血统人群队列中的临床实用性。
Ophthalmology. 2025 Feb;132(2):228-237. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
7
Development and validation of a lung cancer polygenic risk score incorporating susceptibility variants for risk factors.纳入危险因素易感性变异的肺癌多基因风险评分的开发与验证
Int J Cancer. 2025 Mar 1;156(5):953-963. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35210. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
8
Neural network-based integration of polygenic and clinical information: development and validation of a prediction model for 10-year risk of major adverse cardiac events in the UK Biobank cohort.基于神经网络的多基因和临床信息整合:在英国生物库队列中开发和验证用于预测 10 年主要不良心脏事件风险的预测模型。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Feb;4(2):e84-e94. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00249-1.
9
Minimal improvement in coronary artery disease risk prediction in Chinese population using polygenic risk scores: evidence from the China Kadoorie Biobank.基于中国人群多基因风险评分的冠心病风险预测改善甚微:来自中国慢性病前瞻性研究的证据。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2023 Oct 20;136(20):2476-2483. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002694. Epub 2023 May 17.
10
Combining genetic and non-genetic factors to predict the risk of pancreatic cancer in patients with new-onset diabetes mellitus.结合遗传和非遗传因素预测新发糖尿病患者患胰腺癌的风险。
BMC Med. 2025 Apr 15;23(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04048-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacogenomics polygenic risk score: Ready or not for prime time?药物基因组学多基因风险评分:是否已经准备好进入黄金时代?
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Aug;17(8):e13893. doi: 10.1111/cts.13893.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the importance of primary care diagnoses in the UK Biobank.评估初级保健诊断在英国生物库中的重要性。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;39(2):219-229. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-01095-0. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
2
Realistic expectations are key to realising the benefits of polygenic scores.现实的期望是实现多基因评分益处的关键。
BMJ. 2023 Feb 28;380:e073149. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073149.
3
Prediction of type 2 diabetes using genome-wide polygenic risk score and metabolic profiles: A machine learning analysis of population-based 10-year prospective cohort study.
基于全基因组多基因风险评分和代谢谱预测 2 型糖尿病:基于人群的 10 年前瞻性队列研究的机器学习分析。
EBioMedicine. 2022 Dec;86:104383. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104383. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
4
A Polygenic Score for Type 2 Diabetes Improves Risk Stratification Beyond Current Clinical Screening Factors in an Ancestrally Diverse Sample.在一个具有不同祖先背景的样本中,2型糖尿病的多基因评分在当前临床筛查因素之外改善了风险分层。
Front Genet. 2022 Apr 26;13:871260. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.871260. eCollection 2022.
5
Predictive value of circulating NMR metabolic biomarkers for type 2 diabetes risk in the UK Biobank study.循环 NMR 代谢生物标志物对英国生物库研究中 2 型糖尿病风险的预测价值。
BMC Med. 2022 May 3;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02354-9.
6
Genetics of Type 2 Diabetes: Implications from Large-Scale Studies.2型糖尿病的遗传学:大规模研究的启示
Curr Diab Rep. 2022 May;22(5):227-235. doi: 10.1007/s11892-022-01462-3. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
7
Integration of questionnaire-based risk factors improves polygenic risk scores for human coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes.基于问卷的风险因素整合可提高人类冠心病和 2 型糖尿病的多基因风险评分。
Commun Biol. 2022 Feb 23;5(1):158. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02996-0.
8
IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045.国际糖尿病联盟(IDF)糖尿病地图集:2021 年全球、区域和国家糖尿病患病率估算值以及 2045 年预测值。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022 Jan;183:109119. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
9
Responsible use of polygenic risk scores in the clinic: potential benefits, risks and gaps.临床中多基因风险评分的合理使用:潜在的获益、风险和差距。
Nat Med. 2021 Nov;27(11):1876-1884. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01549-6. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
10
Genetic Risk Score Increased Discriminant Efficiency of Predictive Models for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using Machine Learning: Cohort Study.基于机器学习的遗传风险评分提高了 2 型糖尿病预测模型的判别效率:队列研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 17;9:606711. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.606711. eCollection 2021.